Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep II DoR 58/2010 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2010:II.DOR.58.2010 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed review application as statutory conditions for admissibility were not met.

Case Number Sklep II DoR 58/2010
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicant's request to permit a review of the second-instance judgment. The lower courts had dissolved the marital bond, entrusted the minor child to the mother, ordered alimony, and set contact arrangements, while rejecting the plaintiff's alternative requests. The Supreme Court ruled that the legal prerequisites for admissibility under Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure were not satisfied, thereby denying the review application.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure; Article 367c, paragraph 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure: A review application is inadmissible if the statutory conditions for its admissibility are not met.

Keywords

AI generated
Code of Civil Procedure review application admissibility conditions marital dissolution child custody alimony enforcement Supreme Court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 367c, paragraph 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure
AI generated
VSL Sodba IV Cp 2005/2017
Appeal granted; custody order reversed to require clinical psychologist expert opinion due to missing essential assessment components.
Sklep II Ips 892/2007
Self-filed appeal by non-lawyer without bar exam dismissed as inadmissible procedural defect.
VSK sklep Cp 1412/98
Appeal dismissed; half-costs ruling unenforceable and imposes no obligation on defendant to pay.
VSL sodba IV Cp 1838/2010
Appellate court partially allowed appeal, reducing child support from 170 to 110 EUR monthly based on child's actual needs.
VSM Sodba in sklep III Cp 556/2019
Appeal dismissed; court ruled divorce decree on child custody and support is not bound by specific claims.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ker niso izpolnjeni zakonski pogoji, je Vrhovno sodišče predlog za dopustitev revizije zavrnilo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Predlog se zavrne.

OBRAZLOŽITEV:

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je razvezalo zakonsko zvezo pravdnih strank, mladoletna otroka pravdnih strank zaupalo v varstvo, vzgojo in oskrbo materi, tožencu naložilo plačilo preživnine in določilo stike med otrokoma in tožencem. Kar je tožnica zahtevala več ali drugače, je zavrnilo. S sklepom je odločilo o predlagani začasni odredbi glede zaupanja otrok in plačevanja preživnine. Odločilo je še, da vsaka stranka nosi svoje stroške postopka.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbi obeh pravdnih strank zavrnilo ter izpodbijana sodbo in sklep potrdilo. Odločilo je, da vsaka stranka sama krije svoje stroške pritožbenega postopka.

3. Zoper navedeno sodbo (odločitev o zaupanju otrok v varstvo, vzgojo in oskrbo materi) je toženec vložil predlog za dopustitev revizije.

4. Ker pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku niso podani, je Vrhovno sodišče predlog zavrnilo (drugi odstavek 367.c člena ZPP).