Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep I R 155/2009 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2009:I.R.155.2009 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal, ruling the District Court in Celju has jurisdiction based on case value and defendant's residence.

Case Number Sklep I R 155/2009
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia dismissed the appeal regarding jurisdiction, confirming that the District Court in Celju is the competent court. The lower courts had conflicting rulings, with the District Court in Celju asserting jurisdiction based on the high value of the dispute (over 386,000 EUR) and the plaintiff's permanent residence there. The court upheld this decision by applying the relevant provisions of the Act on Civil Procedure Law, which mandate jurisdiction based on case value and defendant's domicile.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku (ZPP), prvi odstavek 32. člena; prvi odstavek 47. člena: The District Court is competent for cases exceeding a specific monetary threshold and where the plaintiff resides within its territorial jurisdiction.

Keywords

AI generated
civil procedure law court jurisdiction case value threshold plaintiff residence competent court district court jurisdictional appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
first paragraph of Article 32 of the Act on Civil Procedure Law
first paragraph of Article 47 of the Act on Civil Procedure Law
AI generated
VSRS Sklep I R 58/2019
Supreme Court transfers execution case to Maribor court due to cleaning staff employment bias concerns.
VSL sklep III Cp 83/00
Appeal dismissed; enforcement of 1997 notary deed requires court transfer upon debtor objection under 1978 ZIP.
VSRS Sklep III R 4/2017
Supreme Court assigns exclusive jurisdiction to Ljubljana for copyright-related disputes involving phonogram producers.
Sklep I R 82/2009
Supreme Court dismisses jurisdiction objection based on late agreement under ZIZ Art. 62(2).
VSL Sklep III Cp 102/2025
Appeal dismissed; dispute between public institute and economic interest association is not a commercial dispute.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Glede na vrednost spornega predmeta je stvarno pristojno za sojenje Okrožno sodišče.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Za odločanje je pristojno Okrožno sodišče v Celju.

OBRAZLOŽITEV:

1. Okrajno sodišče v Ljubljani je s sklepom razveljavilo svoj sklep o izvršbi in odločilo, da bo o zahtevku in stroških odločalo v pravdnem postopku Okrajno sodišče v Šmarju pri Jelšah.

2. Okrajno sodišče v Šmarju v Jelšah je sprožilo spor o pristojnosti, ker naj bi bilo stvarno in krajevno pristojno Okrožno sodišče v Celju.

3. Okrajno sodišče v Šmarju pri Jelšah je utemeljeno sprožilo spor o pristojnosti.

4. Glede na vrednost spornega predmeta (386.032,97 EUR) je stvarno pristojno za sojenje Okrožno sodišče(1). Glede na toženkino stalno prebivališče v Podčetrtku je zato splošno krajevno (in stvarno) pristojno za sojenje Okrožno sodišče v Celju(2).

---.---

Op. št. (1): Primerjaj določbo prvega odstavka 32. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku – ZPP.

Op. št. (2): Primerjaj prvi odstavek 47.člena ZPP.