Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep II DoR 89/2009 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2009:II.DOR.89.2009 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses review application because conditions under Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act are not met.

Case Number Sklep II DoR 89/2009
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicant's request for permission to file a review against the second-instance court's decision. The applicant sought full compensation for a violation of the right to a trial within a reasonable time, while the lower courts had partially granted and partially denied the claim. The court denied the review application because the specific conditions required by Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act were not satisfied.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act; A review application is inadmissible if the applicant fails to demonstrate that the lower court's decision contains a violation of law or a significant error in fact-finding that justifies a retrial.

Keywords

AI generated
review application Civil Procedure Act reasonable time compensation claim admissibility criteria

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act
AI generated
VSC sodba Cp 498/2016
Appeal dismissed; court upheld low compensation for six-year trial delay under small claims procedure rules.
VSL sklep II Cp 2450/2009
Appeal dismissed; prior Ombudsman procedure mandatory prerequisite for State Compensation claims under ZVPSBNO.
VSL sodba I Cpg 622/2012
Court allows contract ratified by management despite initial lack of authorized representation.
VDSS Sodba Pdp 225/2019
Court dismissed appeal against employer's liability for employee's unauthorized payment of traffic fine using employer's card.
VSM sklep I Cpg 172/2015
Appeal dismissed; defendant must pay costs after admitting debt only after enforcement proceedings began.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz 367.a člena ZPP.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Predlog se zavrže.

OBRAZLOŽITEV:

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je tožniku prisodilo 1.500,00 EUR odškodnine zaradi kršitve pravice do sojenja v razumnem roku, v presežku (do 8.300,00 EUR) pa je tožbeni zahtevek zavrnilo. Sodišče druge stopnje je tožnikovi pritožbi delno ugodilo in odškodnino zvišalo na 2.500,00 EUR, zavrnilno sodbo nad tem zneskom pa je potrdilo.

2. Tožnik je vložil predlog za dopustitev revizije zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje v tistem delu, v katerem je njegov zahtevek pravnomočno zavrnjen. Zavzema se za celotno zahtevano odškodnino. Sporna je torej samo višina le-te.

3. Pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku niso podani, zato je Vrhovno sodišče predlog zavrnilo.