Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep II DoR 185/2009 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2009:II.DOR.185.2009 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses review request due to non-fulfillment of Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act conditions.

Case Number Sklep II DoR 185/2009
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the defendant's request to allow a review of the first-instance judgment. The defendant sought to overturn a ruling ordering them to pay 8,697.28 EUR plus statutory interest to the plaintiff. The court denied the request because the specific conditions required to permit a review under Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act were not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act; A review request is inadmissible if the conditions for its admissibility under Article 367a are not fulfilled.

Keywords

AI generated
review request admissibility Civil Procedure Act supreme court jurisdiction statutory interest claim procedural dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 367c, paragraph 2 of the Civil Procedure Act
AI generated
VSRS Sklep II DoR 38/2019
Slovenian Supreme Court dismisses appeal permission request due to case value exceeding statutory threshold.
Sklep III DoR 24/2012
Supreme Court allows appeal on lease termination and unjust enrichment conditions in Slovenian civil procedure.
Sodba II Ips 360/2009
Supreme Court dismisses appeal claiming insufficient non-pecuniary damages for physical pain and mental distress after a fall.
Sodba III Ips 77/2011
Slovenian Supreme Court rejects appeal on warranty claim timing, ruling no statute of limitations applies to defense objections.
Sodba II Ips 719/2009
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where lower court failed to explain witness non-hearing but appellate court justified evidence rejection as non-essential.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Ker niso izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz 367.a člena ZPP je Vrhovno sodišče predlog zavrnilo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Toženec je vložil predlog za dopustitev revizije zoper sodbo pritožbenega sodišča, s katero je bila potrjena sodba sodišča prve stopnje, ki ga zavezuje toženi stranki plačati 8.697,28 EUR z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi od 24. 11. 2006 do plačila.

2. Ker niso izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku, je Vrhovno sodišče predlog zavrnilo (drugi odstavek 367.c člena istega zakona).