Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep II DoR 175/2009 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2009:II.DOR.175.2009 AI generated

Appeal review dismissed because the disputed amount of 500 EUR falls below the 2,000 EUR threshold. The court rejected the request to allow the appeal review. The court ruled that the appeal review cannot be permitted when the value of the contested part of the final judgment does not exceed 2,000 EUR. The court decided as it did because the disputed amount of 500 EUR with interest is clearly below the statutory limit for allowing an appeal review. The court applied the fourth paragraph of Article 367 of the Code of Civil Procedure to dismiss the request. The court held that the appeal review is inadmissible when the value of the contested part of the final judgment does not exceed 2,000 EUR. The court concluded that the appeal review was not permitted due to the low value of the disputed amount. The court determined that the appeal review was inadmissible because the value of the contested part of the final judgment did not exceed 2,000 EUR. The court found that the appeal review was not allowed because the value of the contested part of the final judgment did not exceed 2,000 EUR. The court decided that the appeal review was inadmissible because the value of the contested part of the final judgment did not exceed 2,000 EUR.

Case Number Sklep II DoR 175/2009
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court rejected the plaintiff's request to permit an appeal review against the second-instance judgment. The plaintiff argued for review, but the court noted that the contested portion of the final judgment amounted to only 500 EUR plus interest. The court dismissed the request because the disputed value fell below the 2,000 EUR threshold required to allow an appeal review under the Code of Civil Procedure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Fourth paragraph of Article 367 of the Code of Civil Procedure; An appeal review cannot be permitted if the value of the contested part of the final judgment does not exceed 2,000 EUR.

Keywords

AI generated
appeal review value threshold Code of Civil Procedure disputed amount inadmissible appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
fourth paragraph of Article 367 of the Code of Civil Procedure

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Po določbi četrtega odstavka 367. člena ZPP sodišče ne more dopustiti revizije, ker vrednost izpodbijanega dela pravnomočne sodbe sodišča druge stopnje znaša le 500 EUR s pripadki.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Predlog se zavrže.

OBRAZLOŽITEV:

1. Tožnica je vložila predlog za dopustitev revizije zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje, s katero je bilo ugodeno pritožbi tožene stranke (kot edini pritožbi, saj se tožnica v nasprotju z zavajajočimi in neresničnimi trditvami v predlogu ni pritožila) in sodba sodišča prve stopnje v izpodbijanem obsodilnem delu tako spremenjena, da je bil tožničin zahtevek (tudi) za 500 EUR s pripadki zavrnjen.

2. Po določbi četrtega odstavka 367. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku sodišče ne more dopustiti revizije, če vrednost izpodbijanega dela pravnomočne sodbe ne presega 2.000 EUR. Izpodbijani del pravnomočne sodbe sodišča druge stopnje tega mejnega zneska ne presega, saj znaša le 500 EUR s pripadki; zato sodišče revizije v obravnavanem primeru že iz tega razloga ni moglo dopustiti.