Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep II DoR 114/2009 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2009:II.DOR.114.2009 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal permission request due to non-fulfillment of statutory conditions under Civil Procedure Act.

Case Number Sklep II DoR 114/2009
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicant's request for permission to appeal, upholding the lower court's dismissal of the lawsuit and cost allocation. The applicant argued for further review, but the court found that the legal prerequisites for granting an appeal permission were not met. Consequently, the request was denied pursuant to the specific provisions of the Civil Procedure Act regarding appeal thresholds.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367a paragraph 1 of the Civil Procedure Act; Article 367c paragraph 2 of the Civil Procedure Act: An appeal permission request is inadmissible if the statutory conditions for granting such permission are not fulfilled.

Keywords

AI generated
Civil Procedure Act appeal permission statutory conditions dismissal of request Supreme Court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367a paragraph 1 of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 367c paragraph 2 of the Civil Procedure Act
AI generated
VDSS sklep Psp 425/2011
Appeal dismissed; court enforcement of pension award not a direct social court matter.
VSL Sklep I Cpg 213/2023
Appeal dismissed; creditor lacks interest in mortgage suit when direct enforcement is already attempted and failed due to property exemption.
VSL sodba I Cpg 1471/2015
Contractual penalty upheld where parties knew deadline was impossible due to undefined scope.
Sklep II Ips 386/2008
Appeal dismissed because no single claim exceeds 1 million SIT despite multiple distinct factual bases.
VSL sklep I Cpg 322/2012
Appeal allowed; first instance court erred by rejecting correctable defect in naming the defendant instead of ordering correction.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Ker niso izpolnjeni zakonski pogoji, je Vrhovno sodišče predlog za dopustitev revizije zavrnilo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče druge stopnje je zavrnilo tožnikovo pritožbo in potrdilo sklepa sodišča prve stopnje, s katerima je bila zavržena tožba in tožniku naloženo plačilo stroškov postopka vsakega od tožencev.

2. Zoper navedeni sklep je tožnik vložil predlog za dopustitev revizije.

3. Ker pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku niso podani, je Vrhovno sodišče predlog zavrnilo (drugi odstavek 367.c člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku).