Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep II DoR 162/2009 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2009:II.DOR.162.2009 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed appeal permission request due to non-fulfillment of statutory conditions under Civil Procedure Act.

Case Number Sklep II DoR 162/2009
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicant's request for permission to appeal, upholding the lower court's judgment ordering compensation payments. The applicant argued for a review, but the court found that the legal prerequisites for granting such permission under the Civil Procedure Act were not met. Consequently, the decision was based on the strict statutory requirements for appellate review, which the applicant failed to satisfy.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

367.a(1) CPP; 367.c(2) CPP: A request for permission to appeal is inadmissible if the statutory conditions for granting such permission are not fulfilled.

Keywords

AI generated
permission to appeal Civil Procedure Act statutory conditions dismissed request appellate review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
367.a(1) of the Civil Procedure Act
367.c(2) of the Civil Procedure Act
AI generated
VSL sodba I Cp 2416/2014
Court dismisses defamation claim against satirical article, upholding freedom of expression limits.
VSL Sklep II Cp 2411/2017
Appeal dismissed; plaintiff ordered to pay defendant's legal costs despite procedural objections.
VDSS sodba Pdp 471/2014
Workplace injury claim dismissed; employee's own unsafe climbing caused accident without employer liability.
Sodba in sklep II Ips 406/2006
Civil court dismisses appeal on property damages due to statutory limits but allows appeal on non-property damages.
VSL sodba II Cp 453/2009
Civil court dismissed appeal, bound by final criminal verdict on accident facts until criminal case is reopened.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Ker niso izpolnjeni zakonski pogoji, je Vrhovno sodišče predlog za dopustitev revizije zavrnilo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče druge stopnje je zavrnilo toženkino pritožbo in potrdilo sodbo sodišča prve stopnje, po kateri je vsakemu od tožnikov dolžna plačati odškodnino v višini 2.086,46 EUR z zahtevanimi obrestmi in jima povrniti stroške postopka.

2. Zoper navedeno sodbo je toženka vložila predlog za dopustitev revizije.

3. Ker pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku niso podani, je Vrhovno sodišče predlog zavrnilo (drugi odstavek 367.c člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku)