Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep II DoR 105/2009 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2009:II.DOR.105.2009 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal request because the disputed property value of 417.29 EUR is below the 2,000 EUR threshold.

Case Number Sklep II DoR 105/2009
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court rejected the applicant's request to allow an appeal against the second-instance court's confirmation of the first-instance judgment. The applicant sought to recover a specific portion of parcel 3329 and remove stairs built on the land, but the disputed subject matter was valued at 417.29 EUR. The court dismissed the request because the value of the contested subject matter did not exceed the statutory minimum of 2,000 EUR required for an appeal to be admissible.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Fourth paragraph of Article 367 of the Act on Civil Procedure; An appeal request is inadmissible if the value of the disputed subject matter of the final judgment does not exceed the statutory minimum threshold.

Keywords

AI generated
civil procedure appeal admissibility value threshold property dispute supreme court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367, paragraph 4 of the Act on Civil Procedure
AI generated
VSM Sklep I Cp 810/2020
Appeal dismissed; plaintiff failed to prove likely irreparable harm for temporary injunction on private land.
VSRS Sklep III DoR 30/2021
Supreme Court allows appeal regarding application of insolvency law to real estate transfers with possession delivered but title pending.
VSL Sodba II Cp 1071/2018
Civil court dismisses appeal when administrative decision declaring nationalization void retroactively extinguishes property rights.
VSRS Sklep I R 81/2020
Supreme Court rejects request to transfer case due to lack of impartiality for all judges.
VSRS Sodba II Ips 62/2022
Supreme Court allows appeal, overturns lower court's loss of profit calculation by requiring ex ante normal course of events assessment.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

Vrednost spornega predmeta je za dovoljenost revizije prenizek, zato je Vrhovno sodišče predlog za dopustitev revizije zavrglo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Tožeča stranka je vložila predlog za dopustitev revizije zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje o potrditvi sodbe sodišča prve stopnje, s katero je bil zavrnjen njen tožbeni zahtevek, da ji morata toženca vrniti v neposredno posest točno določen del parcele št. 3329 in odstraniti tisti del stopnic in podesta, ki je zgrajen na tem zemljišču.

2. Po določbi četrtega odstavka 367. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku sodišče revizije ne more dopustiti, če vrednost izpodbijanega dela pravnomočne sodbe ne presega 2.000 EUR. In prav za tak primer gre v obravnavanem sporu: vrednost spornega predmeta je tožnica opredelila z zneskom 417,29 EUR. Vrhovno sodišče je zato predlog za dopustitev revizije zavrglo.