Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep I R 19/2000 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2000:I.R.19.2000 AI generated

Court rejects transfer of jurisdiction due to former extramarital partner relationship as no impartiality issue exists.

Case Number Sklep I R 19/2000
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the lower court's request to transfer jurisdiction to another court. The lower court argued that a dispute involving a former extramarital partner of a court clerk might compromise impartiality, citing Article 67 of the Civil Procedure Act. The Supreme Court found no basis for transfer because the opposing party was not a clerk and the past relationship does not hinder proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 67 of the Civil Procedure Act; A former extramarital relationship between a party and a court clerk does not constitute grounds for transferring jurisdiction if the clerk is not a party and no impartiality is compromised.

Keywords

AI generated
transfer of jurisdiction impartiality of judge extramarital partner court clerk Civil Procedure Act removal of case procedural objection

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 67 of the Civil Procedure Act
AI generated
VSC sklep Kr 41/2000
Extramarital relationship between defendant and court clerk justifies transfer of territorial jurisdiction to another court.
Sklep I R 135/2005
Supreme Court rejects delegation request due to procedural conclusion and principle of economic efficiency.
Sklep I R 105/2002
Personal acquaintance with a party does not constitute a valid reason to delegate a case under Article 67 of the ZPP.
Sklep I R 30/2002
Slovenian Supreme Court dismisses transfer request where client's relative is retired court employee.
Sklep I R 7/96
Court transfers case to another district court due to long-term juror relationship causing impartiality doubts.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlogu za določitev drugega stvarno pristojnega sodišča se ne ugodi.

[JEDRO]

Presoja obstoja pogojev za delegacijo pristojnosti.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Predstojnica Okrajnega sodišča na Jesenicah v predlogu za določitev drugega stvarno pristojnega sodišča za odločanje v pravdni zadevi opr. št. 40/2000 navaja, da je prvi toženec A. A. bivši izvenzakonski partner strojepiske na tem sodišču B. B.. Spore z njo rešuje v več pravdnih postopkih. To bi lahko povzročilo dvom o nepristranskem odločanju. Zato na podlagi 67. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku predlaga prenos pristojnosti na drugo sodišče.

Predlog ni utemeljen.

Iz predloga ne izhaja, da bi bila v postopku udeležena tudi B. B., strojepiska pri Okrajnem sodišču na Jesenicah. Toženec A. A. je po navedbah predloga bivši izvenzakonski partner B. B. Takšna nekdanja zveza pa ni razlog, ki bi oteževal izvedbo postopka.

Glede na navedeno razlogi po 67. členu Zakona o pravdnem postopku niso podani. Zato je Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije predlog za določitev drugega stvarno pristojnega sodišča zavrnilo.