Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep II DoR 34/2009 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2009:II.DOR.34.2009 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses review application because statutory conditions for admissibility were not met.

Case Number Sklep II DoR 34/2009
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicant's request to permit a review of the second-instance court's decision. The applicant sought to overturn a ruling that had annulled the first-instance judgment following their appeal. The court denied the request because the legal requirements for admitting a review under the Code of Civil Procedure were not satisfied.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

367.a(1) ZPP; 367.c(2) ZPP: A review application is inadmissible if the statutory conditions for its admission are not met.

Keywords

AI generated
review application admissibility requirements Code of Civil Procedure second instance decision annulment of judgment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
367.a(1) ZPP
367.c(2) ZPP
AI generated
Sklep II Ips 471/93
Supreme Court dismisses appeal against enforcement ruling, allowing only appeal against rejection of that appeal.
Sklep III DoR 85/2013
Supreme Court dismisses lay revision proposal due to lack of legal qualification and postulatory capacity.
Sklep II DoR 213/2011
Supreme Court dismisses review application due to lack of lawyer qualification proof under ZPP.
VSRS Sklep II DoR 148/2019
Supreme Court rejects review request due to lack of lawyer qualification and procedural bar in enforcement proceedings.
VSRS Sklep II DoR 241/2022
Supreme Court dismisses appeal request due to lack of standing as non-lawyer without bar exam.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Ker zakonski pogoji za dopustitev revizije niso podani, je Vrhovno sodišče predlog zavrnilo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Tožnik je vložil predlog za dopustitev revizije zoper sklep sodišča druge stopnje, s katerim je bilo ugodeno toženkini pritožbi in je bil sklep sodišča prve stopnje o popravi sodbe razveljavljen.

2. Ker pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku niso podani, je Vrhovno sodišče predlog zavrnilo (drugi odstavek 367.c člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku).