Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep I R 127/2008 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2008:I.R.127.2008 AI generated

Supreme Court transfers divorce case to Celje District Court due to conflict of interest with judge.

Case Number Sklep I R 127/2008
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia transferred jurisdiction of a divorce and child custody case to the District Court in Celje upon the plaintiff's request. The plaintiff argued that the current competent court was inappropriate because one of its judges was employed by the defendant's current partner. The court found this employment relationship a significant reason for transferring jurisdiction under the Civil Procedure Act.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

67. člen ZPP; The Supreme Court may transfer a case to another competent court upon a party's request if there is a significant reason, such as a conflict of interest involving a judge employed by a party.

Keywords

AI generated
transfer of jurisdiction conflict of interest judge employment civil procedure act divorce proceedings competent court significant reason

Cited Legislation

AI generated
67. člen ZPP
AI generated
Sklep I R 63/2001
Supreme Court transfers divorce case to another district court due to judge's conflict of interest.
Sklep III R 27/2008
Siblings of a witness and judge do not objectively undermine public trust in court impartiality.
VSRS Sklep I R 58/2017
Supreme Court dismisses transfer of jurisdiction request based on convenience and child's residence.
Sklep I R 95/2006
Appeal dismissed: A judge's potential testimony does not justify transferring a case to another court.
VSRS Sklep I R 41/2022
Supreme Court transfers case to another district court due to perceived lack of judicial impartiality.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Za odločanje v tej zadevi se določi Okrožno sodišče v Celju.

[JEDRO]

Tehten razlog je podan zaradi zatrjevanega razmerja ene od sodnic krajevno pristojnega sodišča s tožencem.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Tožeča stranka je zoper toženo stranko pri Okrožnem sodišču v ... vložila tožbo za razvezo zakonske zveze, dodelitev otrok in plačevanje preživnine. Hkrati je v isti vlogi predlagala določitev drugega stvarno pristojnega sodišča, ki naj sodi v zadevi, ker je sedanja partnerka tožene stranke zaposlena pri sicer krajevno pristojnem sodišču.

Predlog je utemeljen.

Po določbi 67. člena ZPP lahko vrhovno sodišče tudi na predlog pravdne stranke določi drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče, da postopa v zadevi, če je očitno, da se bo tako laže opravil postopek, ali če so za to drugi tehtni razlogi. Presoja zadeve pokaže, da je v tem primeru tehten razlog, ki pogojuje prenos krajevne pristojnosti, podan zaradi v predlogu zatrjevanega razmerja ene od sodnic krajevno pristojnega sodišča s tožencem.

Za odločanje v zadevi je delegirano Okrožno sodišče v Celju.