Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep X Ips 749/2008 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2009:X.IPS.749.2008 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses review against final Supreme Court ruling as law prohibits such review.

Case Number Sklep X Ips 749/2008
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicant's review against a final decision by the Supreme Court regarding the appointment of a company director. The applicant argued for further judicial scrutiny, but the court noted that the law does not provide for a review against the Supreme Court's rulings. Consequently, the review was deemed inadmissible under Article 83(1) of the Administrative Dispute Act.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 83(1) of the Administrative Dispute Act; A review filed against a final Supreme Court ruling is inadmissible because the law does not provide for such a remedy.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative review final Supreme Court ruling inadmissible remedy procedural exhaustion administrative dispute act

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 83(1) of the Administrative Dispute Act (ZUS-1)
Article 89 of the Administrative Dispute Act (ZUS-1)
AI generated
Sklep I Up 488/2008
Appointment of an acting director is an act of political discretion, not an administrative act subject to judicial review.
Sodba U 46/99
Administrative court dismisses claim that government must reassign former audit court member to specific equivalent post.
Sklep I Up 199/2008
Administrative appeal dismissed because judicial protection was already granted at labor court, precluding administrative court jurisdiction.
Sklep I Up 23/2002
Appeal dismissed; foreign resident without local counsel must appoint an agent or face dismissal.
Sodba VIII Ips 164/2001
Supreme Court allows appeal, overturns second instance, and confirms first instance judgment regarding social work experience requirements.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

Ker je v obravnavani zadevi tožnik vložil revizijo zoper sklep Vrhovnega sodišča RS, zoper katerega je po zakonu ni mogoče vložiti, saj je zakon ne predvideva, je takšna revizija glede na določbo prvega odstavka 83. člena ZUS-1 nedovoljena.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

S sklepom, U 344/2008-2 z dne 5. 3. 2008, je Upravno sodišče Republike Slovenije v Ljubljani zavrglo tožnikovo tožbo zoper sklep tožene stranke, z dne 28. 7. 1994, s katerim je tožena stranka za vršilko dolžnosti direktorice Slada RS ... imenovala X.Y. Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije je s sklepom z dne 11. 9. 2008 zavrnilo tožnikovo pritožbo in potrdilo navedeni sklep sodišč prve stopnje.

Tožnik vlaga revizijo zoper navedeni sklep upravnega sodišča z dne 5. 3. 2008 v zvezi z navedenim sklepom Vrhovnega sodišča z dne 11. 9. 2008.

Revizija ni dovoljena.

Po določbi prvega odstavka 83. člena Zakona o upravnem sporu (ZUS-1, Uradni list RS, št. 105/06) lahko stranke zoper pravnomočno sodbo, izdano na prvi stopnji, vložijo revizijo v 30 dneh od vročitve prepisa sodbe.

Ker pa je v obravnavani zadevi tožnik vložil revizijo zoper sklep sodišča prve stopnje v zvezi s sklepom Vrhovnega sodišča RS, zoper katerega je po zakonu ni mogoče vložiti, saj je zakon ne predvideva, je takšna revizija glede na določbo prvega odstavka 83. člena ZUS-1 nedovoljena in jo je Vrhovno sodišče v skladu z 89. členom ZUS-1 zavrglo.