Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep III Ips 41/2009 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2009:III.IPS.41.2009 AI generated

Appeal dismissed because the disputed amount did not exceed the statutory threshold for appellate review in commercial cases.

Case Number Sklep III Ips 41/2009
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the appeal filed by the defendant against the second-instance judgment. The defendant argued for a review, but the court found the disputed monetary value of 17,872.03 EUR fell below the 20,864.63 EUR threshold required for appellate intervention in commercial disputes. Consequently, the appeal was inadmissible under the relevant provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, and the defendant bore the costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 490 of the Code of Civil Procedure; Article 377 of the Code of Civil Procedure: In commercial disputes, an appeal is not permitted if the value of the disputed subject matter does not exceed the statutory limit, rendering the appeal inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
commercial disputes appellate threshold inadmissible appeal value limit Code of Civil Procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 490 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 377 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 154 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 130 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 13 of the Act on the Introduction of the Euro
AI generated
Sklep III Ips 126/2008
Supreme Court rejects appeal where separate road crossing claims each fall below the €20,864.63 threshold.
Sklep III Ips 227/2008
Supreme Court dismisses revision against a second-instance decision remanding a case for retrial.
Sodba III Ips 170/2006
Appeal allowed; assignment of mortgage rights via debt transfer does not require land registry entry.
Sodba in sklep III Ips 160/2008
Trademark infringement appeal partially allowed; domain ban and destruction order reversed due to overreach beyond real estate services.
Sklep III Ips 20/2009
Supreme Court dismisses appeal against second instance ruling as procedural step did not conclude the case.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se zavrže.

Tožena stranka krije sama svoje stroške revizijskega postopka.

[JEDRO]

Ker vrednost spornega predmeta ni presegla mejne vrednosti za dovoljenost revizije, revizija ni dovoljena.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Obravnavani postopek se je pred sodiščem prve stopnje končal pred uveljavitvijo Zakona o spremembah in dopolnitvah Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP-D, Ur. l. RS, št. 45/2008). Zato se po drugem odstavku njegovega 130. člena nadaljuje po dotedanjih določbah Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP, Ur. l. RS, št. 73/2007 – uradno prečiščeno besedilo).

2. Po določbi 490. člena ZPP revizija v gospodarskih sporih ni bila dovoljena, če vrednost spornega predmeta glede izpodbijanega dela pravnomočne sodbe ni presegla 20.864,63 EUR (prej 5,000.000,00 SIT).(1)

3. V obravnavani zadevi je bilo toženi stranki naloženo plačilo 17.872,03 EUR (prej 4,282.854,00 SIT) z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi. Ker vrednost spornega predmeta ni presegla zgoraj navedene mejne vrednosti za dovoljenost revizije, revizija, ki jo je tožena stranka vložila zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje, ni dovoljena. Vrhovno sodišče jo je zavrglo na podlagi 377. člena ZPP, ker tega v mejah svojih pravic ni storilo že sodišče prve stopnje.

4. Ker tožena stranka z revizijo ni uspela, po prvem odstavku 154. člena ZPP sama krije svoje stroške revizijskega postopka.

---.---

Op. št. (1): Po prvem odstavku 13. člena Zakona o uvedbi eura (Ur. l. RS, št. 114/2006) se šteje, da se tolarski zneski, navedeni v predpisih in sodnih aktih, z dnem uvedbe eura (1. 1. 2007) glasijo na euro, preračunano po tečaju zamenjave. Tečaj zamenjave je določen v Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 1086/2006 z dne 11. 7. 2006 (UL L št. 195 z dne 15. 7. 2006) in znaša 239,640 slovenskih tolarjev za 1 euro.