Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep II Dor 21/2009 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2009:II.DOR.21.2009 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses revision request due to failure to meet statutory conditions under Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act.

Case Number Sklep II Dor 21/2009
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicant's request for permission to file a revision against the second-instance judgment. The applicant sought to challenge the partial denial of an alimony increase, arguing procedural errors in the lower courts' decisions. The court dismissed the request because the applicant failed to satisfy the specific conditions required by Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act; A revision request is inadmissible if the applicant fails to demonstrate that the lower court's decision violates the law or contains a significant error in fact-finding.

Keywords

AI generated
revision request Civil Procedure Act alimony increase second instance judgment statutory conditions

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act
AI generated
Sklep III DoR 42/2012
Appeal dismissed partially; Supreme Court allows review regarding procedural violation on claim amount.
Sklep II DoR 185/2010
Supreme Court dismisses late application for leave to appeal as it was filed outside the 30-day statutory deadline.
Sklep III DoR 36/2012
Supreme Court allows appeal regarding whether a contract terminated before bankruptcy counts as a mutual breach under ZFPPIPP Article 24.
Sklep II DoR 551/2010
Supreme Court dismisses appeal request due to late payment of court fees under ZPP Article 105a(3).
Sklep X Ips 860/2007
Supreme Court dismisses appeal for lack of serious legal issue and severe consequences under Administrative Dispute Resolution Act.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Vrhovno sodišče je predlog zavrnilo, ker niso podani pogoji iz 367.a člena Zakona pravdnem postopku.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Toženec je vložil predlog za dopustitev revizije zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje s katero je bilo delno ugodeno tožnikovi pritožbi proti zavrnilnemu delu prvostopenjske sodbe v zvezi z zahtevanim zvišanjem preživnine.

2. Vrhovno sodišče je predlog zavrnilo, ker niso podani pogoji iz 367.a člena Zakona pravdnem postopku.