Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep I R 32/99 ECLI:SI:VSRS:1999:I.R.32.99 AI generated

Supreme Court transfers case to different court because reviewing same court's legality requires impartiality.

Case Number Sklep I R 32/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia transferred jurisdiction from the District Court in Kranj to the District Court in Škofja Loka. The plaintiff argued that the original court's employees committed illegal acts during eviction, necessitating a review of their legality. The court ruled that a court cannot legally judge its own past conduct, thus transferring the case to a different competent court.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

68. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku; A court cannot be the sole judge of its own legality, requiring transfer to a different competent court to ensure impartiality.

Keywords

AI generated
judicial impartiality jurisdiction transfer review of legality same court bias Zakon o pravdnem postopku

Cited Legislation

AI generated
68. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku
Zato je Vrhovno sodišče odločilo, da bo v tej zadevi odločalo Okrajno sodišče v Škofji Loki kot bližnje stvarno pristojno sodišče (68. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku).
AI generated
VSL Sklep VII Kp 88666/2010
Appeal against a non-appealable decision by a special senate regarding court fees is dismissed as procedurally inadmissible.
Sklep I R 10/2012
Supreme Court dismisses repeated jurisdiction transfer request as it lacks new grounds beyond previously rejected arguments.
VSRS Sklep I R 114/2017
Supreme Court clarifies that property division cases under ZZZDR are judged by value, not family law rules, determining territorial jurisdiction.
Sklep I Up 867/2002
Appeal allowed; court quashes dismissal for unclear party definition and procedural violation. Dismissed
VSRS Sklep I R 164/2021
Supreme Court transfers case jurisdiction due to compromised impartiality appearance between plaintiff judge and court judges.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Za odločanje v tej zadevi se določi Okrajno sodišče v Škofji Loki.

[JEDRO]

Presoja o tem, ali je sodišče v določenem postopku ravnalo zakonito, ne more biti prepuščena istemu sodišču.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Pri Okrajnem sodišču v Kranju so vložili tožniki dne 16.5.1997 tožbo zaradi motenja posesti proti obema toženima strankama.

Okrajno sodišče v Kranju v predlogu z dne 10.5.1999 navaja, da tožniki utemeljujejo svojo tožbo z navedbo, da so ravnali organi Okrajnega sodišča v Kranju pri deložaciji tožnikov nasilno in nezakonito. Ker gre za presojo dela delavcev Okrajnega sodišča v Kranju, predlaga, da Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije določi na podlagi 68. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče.

Predlog je utemeljen.

Iz tožbe v zadevi opr. št. P 322/97 je razvidno, da tožeča stranka očita organom Okrajnega sodišča v Kranju nezakonito postopanje pri deložaciji tožnikov in šteje to kot bistveno utemeljitev svojega tožbenega zahtevka.

Presoja o tem, ali je sodišče v določenem postopku ravnalo zakonito, ne more biti prepuščena istemu sodišču. Zato je Vrhovno sodišče odločilo, da bo v tej zadevi odločalo Okrajno sodišče v Škofji Loki kot bližnje stvarno pristojno sodišče (68. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku).