Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL sklep III Cp 750/2000 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2000:III.CP.750.2000 AI generated

Appeal dismissed because no legal remedy exists against enforcement order under ZIZ Art. 9(7).

Case Number VSL sklep III Cp 750/2000
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the debtor's appeal, upholding the first-instance decision that rejected the objection to a second public auction. The debtor argued the debt was already settled by the insurance company and sought to invalidate the enforcement order. The court ruled that Article 9(7) of the Enforcement and Security Act explicitly prohibits any legal remedy against such orders, rendering the objection inadmissible and the appeal without merit.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 9(7) ZIZ; Art. 243(3) ZPP: No legal remedy exists against an enforcement order for a second auction; objections must be rejected as inadmissible, and appeals against such decisions are dismissed.

Keywords

AI generated
enforcement order second auction legal remedy inadmissible appeal ZIZ Art. 9(7)

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 9(7) of the Enforcement and Security Act (ZIZ)
Art. 243(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPP)
AI generated
VSL Sklep IV Ip 295/2024
Appeal dismissed; creditor's pre-litigation claim prevails over debtor's new defense in security proceedings.
VSL Sklep Cst 625/2018
Appeal dismissed; court confirms first instance ruling voiding sale of electricity connection due to statutory restrictions.
VSC Sklep I Ip 306/2024
Appeals against seizure objection rejection dismissed; third party must sue separately for invalid execution.
VSL sodba in sklep II Cp 4632/2010
Appeal dismissed; subrogation claim against third party failed due to lack of knowledge of debt.
VSL Sklep Cst 218/2022
Appeal dismissed; claim filed after bankruptcy start and beyond 12-month preclusion period is inadmissible.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba se zavrne in se potrdi sklep sodišča prve stopnje.

[JEDRO]

Zoper odredbo ni pravnega sredstva.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Z izpodbijanim sklepom je sodišče prve stopnje dolžnikov ugovor, ki ga je vložil zoper izvedbo druge dražbe, kot nedopusten zavrglo.

Proti sklepu se pritožuje dolžnik ter v pritožbi ponovno zatrjuje, da izvršba ni dopustna. Dolžnik zatrjuje, da je bila celotna terjatev že poravnana s strani Zavarovalnice Adriatic. Smiselno predlaga razveljavitev sklepa o izvršbi.

Pritožba ni utemeljena.

Sodišče prve stopnje je z izpodbijanim sklepom utemeljeno zavrglo tožnikov ugovor, ki ga je vložil proti odredbi, s katero je prvo sodišče določilo drugo javno dražbo. Po 7. odst. 9. člena Zakona o izvršbi in zavarovanju (ZIZ) zoper odredbo ni pravnega sredstva. Ker torej zakon zoper odredbo sodišča ne dopušča pravnega sredstva, je zato prvo sodišče dožnikov ugovor kot nedovoljen zavrglo. Iz teh razlogov tudi ni dopustno vsebinsko obravnavati sedanje dolžnikove pritožbene navedbe. Neutemeljeno dolžnikovo pritožbo je bilo treba zavrniti in potrditi sklep sodišča prve stopnje (2. točka 365. člena ZPP v zvezi s 15. členom ZIZ).