Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL sklep III Cp 1206/2000 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2000:III.CP.1206.2000 AI generated

Appeal dismissed because the debtor lacks legal interest to challenge a completed enforcement termination.

Case Number VSL sklep III Cp 1206/2000
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the appeal filed by the debtor against the first-instance judge's decision to terminate the enforcement proceedings. Although the debtor argued that the enforcement was not fully realized due to pending administrative boundary determinations, the court found the enforcement effectively completed by the geodetic survey. The court ruled that terminating enforcement is a procedural act beneficial to the debtor, thereby negating any legal interest for the debtor to challenge it.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o izvršilnem postopku; Zakon o pravdnem postopku: A debtor lacks legal interest to appeal a decision terminating enforcement proceedings once the enforcement act has been fully realized, as such termination is inherently beneficial to the debtor.

Keywords

AI generated
enforcement termination legal interest requirement procedural act benefit enforcement completion appeal inadmissibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
3. odstavek 343. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku
15. člen Zakona o izvršilnem postopku
1. odstavek 343. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku
AI generated
VSL sklep I Cp 1477/2009
Appeal allowed; witness not entitled to fees for work not done per court order.
VSL sklep II Cp 96/2002
Appeal dismissed because the first-instance ruling was a judicial management decision not subject to appeal.
VSL Sklep I Cp 2107/2020
Appeal dismissed; expert report admissible only for suitability assessment, not final ownership determination.
VSL sklep I Cp 1394/2000
Appeal dismissed; land registry data from competent surveying authority cannot be challenged via appeal.
VSL Sklep I Cp 1139/2017
Appeal dismissed; court held intermediate ruling on survey adequacy for cadastral entry is valid under ZVEtL.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

Za pritožbo zoper sklep o ustavitvi izvršbe dolžnik nima pravnega interesa.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Z izpodbijanim sklepom je sodišče prve stopnje ugotovilo, da je izvršilni postopek končan in ga je zato ustavilo. Z dne 10.4.2000 izvedeno geodetsko odmero je bil namreč sklep o izvršbi v celoti realiziran. Proti sklepu se pritožuje dolžnik, ki meni, da izvršba ne more biti končana, ker po odmeri parcele št. 612 k.o..., ki je bila predmet izvršbe, še ni bila izdana upravna odločba o določitvi mej in novi parcelni številki. Zmotno pa je tudi uporabljeno materialno pravo, saj se je v izvršbi odločalo o legi odmerjenega zemljišča, ki s sodbama kot izršilnima naslovamoma ni določena.

To pomeni samovoljo izvršilnega organa in prekoračitev pooblastil ter s tem poseg v dolžnikove pravice. Pritožba ni dovoljena. Ustavitev izvršbe je procesno dejanje, ki je vsekakor dolžniku v korist, zato za izpodbijanje odločitve o ustavitvi postopka dolžnik nima pravnega interesa. Pritožba, ki jo je vložil, torej glede na določilo 3. odstavka 343. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (v zvezi s 15. členom ZIZ) ni dovoljena in jo je bilo zato treba v skladu z določilom 1. odst. navedenega predpisa (v zvezi s čl.

15. Zakona o izvršilnem postopku) zavreči brez vsebinskega obravnavanja.