Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL sklep I Cp 129/2000 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2000:I.CP.129.2000 AI generated

Appeal dismissed because appeal was filed after the eight-day statutory deadline expired.

Case Number VSL sklep I Cp 129/2000
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court dismissed the appellant's complaint, upholding the first-instance judge's decision to reject the appeal as untimely. The appellant filed the appeal on December 14, 1999, but the eight-day statutory period for appeals in minor value disputes expired on December 7, 1999. The court ruled that the first-instance court correctly applied the Civil Procedure Act to reject the late filing without a hearing.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

343.1. ZPP; 458.3. ZPP: An appeal filed after the expiration of the statutory time limit is rejected without a hearing.

Keywords

AI generated
statutory time limit appeal procedure minor value dispute procedural deadline Civil Procedure Act untimely appeal rejection without hearing

Cited Legislation

AI generated
343.1. ZPP
458.3. ZPP
365.2. ZPP
AI generated
VSL sklep III Cp 1859/99
Appeal dismissed because the claimant filed the appeal after the statutory deadline, and illness did not extend the time limit.
VSL sklep I Cp 1575/2012
Appeal against second-instance judgment dismissed as appeals are only permitted against first-instance judgments.
VSL sklep II Cp 342/2000
Appeal dismissed because service of documents to a lawyer starts the appeal period for the client.
VSL Sklep II Cp 879/2019
Appeal dismissed because appeal against an expert witness appointment order is procedurally inadmissible under ZPP.
VSC Sklep II Kp 49894/2018
Appeal dismissed because the 30-day appeal period expired before the defendant could submit it via post.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba se zavrne in se potrdi sklep sodišča prve stopnje.

[JEDRO]

Če je pritožba vložena po preteku zakonskega roka, jo zavrže s sklepom predsednik senata sodišča prve stopnje brez naroka.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Z izpodbijanim sklepom je sodišče prve stopnje zavrglo toženkino pritožbo zoper sodbo z dne 8.11.1999, opr. št. VI P 393/98. Proti sklepu se pritožuje toženka, vendar v pritožbi le predlaga, naj se jo oprosti plačila tožbenega zahtevka vključno s sodnimi stroški. Dne 14.12.1999 je namreč vložila pritožbo z dokazili. Pritožba ni utemeljena. V skladu s podatki v spisu je prvo sodišče pravilno ugotovilo, da je toženka prejela prvostopno sodbo z dne 8.11.1999, opr. št. VI P 393/98, dne 29.11.1999 kot tudi, da je pritožbo zoper to sodbo vložila dne 14.12.1999.

V obravnavani zadevi gre za spor majhne vrednosti, rok za pritožbo v teh zadevah pa znaša po 3. odst. 458. čl. ZPP osem dni. Zadnji dan osemdnevnega pritožbenega roka proti prvostopni sodbi je potekel dne 7.12.1999 kar pomeni, da je toženka pritožbo zoper sodbo vložila prepozno. Sodišče prve stopnje je zato v skladu s 1. odst. 343. čl. ZPP toženkino pritožbo utemeljeno zavrglo kot prepozno. Iz navedenih razlogov je sodišče druge stopnje toženkino pritožbo kot neutemeljeno zavrnilo in potrdilo prvostopni sklep (2. odst. 365. ZPP).