Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL sklep I Cp 688/2000 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2000:I.CP.688.2000 AI generated

Appeal dismissed because the detainee had no legal interest after detention ended.

Case Number VSL sklep I Cp 688/2000
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the appeal filed by a detainee against a decision ending his detention in a psychiatric facility. The first-instance court ruled that the detention ceased on April 11, 2000, and assigned procedural costs to the court. The appellate court found the appeal inadmissible because the detainee lacked a legal interest to contest a decision that terminated his deprivation of liberty.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o nepravdnem postopku - ZNP, 37. člen; Zakon o pravdnem postopku - ZPP, 343. člen, 3. odstavek: An appeal is inadmissible if the appellant lacks a legal interest, such as when a detention order has already been terminated.

Keywords

AI generated
legal interest requirement inadmissible appeal detention termination psychiatric facility procedural costs

Cited Legislation

AI generated
37. člen Zakona o nepravdnem postopku - ZNP
3. odst. 343. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku - ZPP
čl. 77/1 in 77/2 ZNP
torej nima interesa, da bi se proti takemu sklepu pritožil (glej tudi čl. 77/1 in 77/2 ZNP).
351. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku - ZPP
AI generated
VSL Sklep II Cp 2033/2024
Appeal granted; psychiatric detention order revoked due to insufficient and unargued expert opinion under ZDZdr.
VSL sklep II Cp 3984/2009
Appeal granted; first-instance court dismissed involuntary hospitalization due to lack of substantive legal reasoning.
VSL Sklep I Cp 218/2024
Mental health detention upheld where patient's psychosis endangers health and property despite financial claims.
VSL Sklep I Cp 969/2024
Appeal dismissed; involuntary detention upheld as debt caused severe financial harm under mental health law.
VSC Sklep II Cp 285/2024
Appeal dismissed because psychiatric hospital discharged patient before court order expired, eliminating legal interest.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

Ker je bilo s sklepom odločeno, da je pridržanje prenehalo, pritožnik nima pravnega interesa za pritožbo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje je z izpodbijanim sklepom odločilo, da je pridržanje V. L. na zaprtem oddelku Psihiatrične bolnišnice ... z dne 11.4.2000 prenehalo. Odločilo je tudi, da gredo stroški pridržalnega postopka v breme sodišča. Proti sklepu se pritožuje V. L.. Pritožba ni dovoljena. Postopek o pridržanju oseb v psihiatričnih zdravstvenih organizacijah je nepravdni postopek. Po določbi 37. čl. Zakona o nepravdnem postopku - ZNP se v tem postopku uporabljajo določbe Zakona o pravdnem postopku - ZPP, če s tem ali drugim zakonom ni drugače določeno. Po določbi 3. odst. 343. čl. ZPP je nedovoljena med drugim pritožba, za katero pritožnik ni imel pravnega interesa. V obravnavani zadevi gre za tako situacijo. Z izpodbijanim sklepom je določeno, da je pridržanje V. L. dne 11.4.2000 prenehalo. V. L. torej nima interesa, da bi se proti takemu sklepu pritožil (glej tudi čl. 77/1 in 77/2 ZNP). Po določbi 351. čl. ZPP v zvezi s čl. 37 ZNP je bilo torej treba pritožbo zavreči.