Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSC sklep Kr 41/2000 ECLI:SI:VSCE:2000:KR.41.2000 AI generated

Extramarital relationship between defendant and court clerk justifies transfer of territorial jurisdiction to another court.

Case Number VSC sklep Kr 41/2000
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The presiding judge of the requesting court proposed transferring territorial jurisdiction to another competent court due to an extramarital relationship between the defendant and the court clerk. The Supreme Court in Celje found this relationship a significant reason for the transfer and approved the proposal. Consequently, jurisdiction was assigned to the Okrajno sodišče v Š. pri C., which is also the nearest court.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o kazenskem postopku; Zakon o sodiščih: An extramarital relationship between the accused and a court clerk constitutes a significant reason for transferring territorial jurisdiction to another competent court.

Keywords

AI generated
extramarital relationship court clerk territorial jurisdiction transfer of jurisdiction significant reason criminal procedure supreme court

Cited Legislation

AI generated
III. odstavek 35. člena ZKP
Opomba: Zoper ta sklep ni pritožbe (III. odstavek 35. člena ZKP)Đ
AI generated
VSRS Sklep III R 34/2016
Appeal dismissed: Same judge leading bankruptcy and related litigation does not automatically violate impartiality rights.
Sklep I R 104/2006
Foreign partner of court clerk is not grounds for transferring case to another court.
VSRS Sklep I R 195/2024
Appeal dismissed; mere acquaintance between lawyer and judge does not prove bias under ZPP Art. 67.
Sklep I R 135/2005
Supreme Court rejects delegation request due to procedural conclusion and principle of economic efficiency.
Sklep I R 19/2000
Court rejects transfer of jurisdiction due to former extramarital partner relationship as no impartiality issue exists.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlogu se u g o d i in se za odločanje v tej zadevi določi stvarno pristojno O. s. v Š. pri C..

[JEDRO]

Zunajzakonsko razmerje med obdolžencem in delavko sodišča, ki naj bi mu sodilo, je tehtni razlog za prenos krajevne pristojnosti na drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Predstojnica predlagajočega sodišča je predlagala prenos krajevne pristojnosti na drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče, saj je obdolženi D. I.zunajzakonski partner delavke na tem sodišču F. B.. Predlog je utemeljen. Razmerje med obdolžencem in delavko O. s. v Š. pri J. je po mnenju višjega sodišča tehtni razlog za prenos krajevne pristojnosti. Zato je predlogu ugodilo in določilo za sojenje v tej zadevi O.s.v Š. pri C., ki je tudi najbližje okrajno sodišče in zato stroški kazenskega postopka ne bodo bistveno višji. Opomba: Zoper ta sklep ni pritožbe (III. odstavek 35. člena ZKP)Đ