Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL sklep II Cpg 350/2000 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2000:II.CPG.350.2000 AI generated

Appeal allowed; partial withdrawal of enforcement request in different case invalidates first-instance dismissal.

Case Number VSL sklep II Cpg 350/2000
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court granted the creditor's appeal, vacating the first-instance decision that had dismissed the enforcement request. The creditor argued that a partial withdrawal of the enforcement proposal was mistakenly treated as a total withdrawal, while the opposing party contended the procedural record supported the dismissal. The court ruled that since the withdrawal applied to a separate enforcement case, the first-instance ruling was erroneous and the matter was remanded for further proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 15 of the Enforcement and Security of Creditor's Rights Act; Article 380(3) of the Civil Procedure Act: A partial withdrawal of an enforcement request in a different case does not constitute a total withdrawal, rendering a dismissal based on such a premise invalid.

Keywords

AI generated
enforcement request withdrawal partial withdrawal validity separate enforcement case procedural error review remand for further proceedings

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 15 of the Enforcement and Security of Creditor's Rights Act
Article 380(3) of the Civil Procedure Act
AI generated
VSL sklep II Cpg 1256/99
Appeal allowed: First instance court erred by annulling a final enforcement order when creditor only suspended execution.
VSL sodba I Cp 2015/2004
Appeal dismissed; plaintiff failed to prove payment was a transfer of debt, not a new payment.
VSL sklep III Cp 1694/99
Appeal dismissed; execution order based on 1978 Enforcement Act remains valid under transitional rules.
VSL sklep I Cpg 714/2011
Appeal dismissed; public notice of service by post constitutes valid service under ZPP.
VSL sklep I Cpg 219/2007
Appeal granted; arbitration clause deemed non-exclusive as it explicitly retained court jurisdiction.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožbi se ugodi, izpodbijani sklep se razveljavi in zadeva vrne sodišču prve stopnje v nadaljnji postopek.

[JEDRO]

Iz podatkov v spisu izhaja, da upnik v obravnavani izvršilni zadevi ni v celoti umaknil svojega predloga za izvršbo, saj takega umika v spisu ni, je le umik izvršilnega predloga, ki ga je v izvršilni zadevi opr. št. Ig 98/07444 poslal upnik M... d.o.o. Ker je evidentno, da gre za umik v povsem drugi zadevi, je izpodbijani sklep sodišča prve stopnje napačen.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje je z izpodbijanim sklepom v celoti razveljavilo sklep o izvršbi opr. št. Ig 96/15356 z dne 13.11.1996 in ustavilo postopek.

Upnik se je zoper sklep pravočasno pritožil in navedel, da ni v celoti umaknil predloga za izvršbo in je očitno prišlo do pomote, zato predlaga razveljavitev napadenega sklepa.

Pritožba je utemeljena.

Iz podatkov v spisu izhaja, da upnik v obravnavani izvršilni zadevi ni v celoti umaknil svojega predloga za izvršbo, saj takega umika v spisu ni. Je le delni umik z dne 6.10.1997, ki ga je sodišče upoštevalo s sklepom o delni ustavitvi z dne 3.12.1998, ter umik izvršilnega predloga, ki ga je v izvršilni zadevi opr. št. Ig 98/07444 poslal upnik M... d.o.o. (list. št. 9). Ker je evidentno, da gre za umik v povsem drugi zadevi, je izpodbijani sklep sodišča prve stopnje napačen, zato je sodišče druge stopnje na podlagi 3. točke 380. čl. Zakona o pravdnem postopku v zvezi s 15. čl. Zakona o izvršbi in zavarovanju upnikovi pritožbi ugodilo, izpodbijani sklep razveljavilo in zadevo vrnilo sodišču prve stopnje v nadaljnji postopek.