Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL sklep III Cp 347/2000 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2000:III.CP.347.2000 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; debtor failed to prove grounds for suspending enforcement under ZIZ Art. 71.1.

Case Number VSL sklep III Cp 347/2000
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court dismissed the debtor's appeal and upheld the first-instance court's rejection of the request to suspend enforcement proceedings. The debtor argued that future repayment capacity and financial hardship warranted a delay, but the court found these factors insufficient to meet the statutory requirements of Article 71 of the Enforcement and Security Act. Consequently, the court ruled that the debtor did not demonstrate valid grounds for suspension and confirmed the lower court's correct decision.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 71 of the Enforcement and Security Act; Article 365(2) of the Civil Procedure Act: A debtor's appeal against a rejection of a request to suspend enforcement is inadmissible if the debtor fails to prove specific statutory grounds for suspension, as general financial hardship or future repayment plans do not constitute valid reasons under the law.

Keywords

AI generated
enforcement suspension statutory grounds civil procedure appeal financial hardship ZIZ Article 71

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 71 of the Enforcement and Security Act
Article 365(2) of the Civil Procedure Act
AI generated
VSM sklep I Ip 1003/2012
Appeal dismissed; lease termination depends solely on agreed six-month period under OZ Art. 59(3).
VSC Sklep I Ip 382/2021
Appeal allowed; first instance court failed to assess domestic protection conditions under ZIZ Art. 71.
VSRS Sklep II DoR 344/2021
Supreme Court dismisses review request against enforcement order as new law limits review to specific final judgments.
VSL Sklep II Ip 1369/2022
Appeal dismissed; debtor bears burden to prove necessity of seized assets for business activities.
VSL Sklep I Ip 30/2026
Appeal granted; first instance court dismissed due to insufficient reasoning on debt relief and consumer status.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba se zavrne in se izpodbijani sklep potrdi.

[JEDRO]

Dolžnik ni dokazal, da obstoje razlogi za odložitev izvršbe.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Z izpodbijanim sklepom je sodišče prve stopnje zavrnilo predlog dolžnika za odložitev izvršbe, ker je ugotovilo, da ni pogojev, ki jih določa 1. odst. 71. čl. Zakona o izvršbi in zavarovanju - ZIZ za odložitev izvršbe.

Proti sklepu se dolžnik pritožuje. Navaja, da bo znesek poravnal leta 2000, ko bo izplačal posojilo in sodne stroške. Predlaga, da se njegovi prošnji ugodi. Prosi, da sodišče razume njegove težave in jih upošteva.

Pritožba ni utemeljena.

Sodišče prve stopnje je obrazložilo, zakaj šteje, da dolžnik ni dokazal, da obstajajo razlogi za odložitev izvršbe. Ni konkretiziral škode, slabo finančno stanje pa ni razlog za odložitev izvršbe.

Sodišče prve stopnje je tudi pravilno ugotovilo, da ni mogoče govoriti o kakšnem drugem posebno opravičenem razlogu iz 2. odst. 71. čl. ZIZ.

Pritožbeno sodišče tako ugotavlja, da je odločitev sodišča prve stopnje pravilna in da pri odločanju sodišče prve stopnje tudi ni naredilo nobene kršitve, na katero pazi pritožbeno sodišče po uradni dolžnosti. Neutemeljeno pritožbo je bilo treba zavrniti in potrditi pravilno odločitev sodišča prve stopnje (čl. 365 tč. 2 Zakona o pravdnem postopku v zvezi s čl. 15 ZIZ).