Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL sklep II Cp 279/2000 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2000:II.CP.279.2000 AI generated

Appeal dismissed as time-barred; plaintiff filed appeal after statutory 15-day deadline expired.

Case Number VSL sklep II Cp 279/2000
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court dismissed the appeal because it was filed after the expiration of the statutory 15-day limitation period. The appellant received the first-instance judgment on December 27, 1999, but submitted the appeal on January 12, 2000, missing the deadline. The court ruled that time-barred appeals are inadmissible and cannot be substantively reviewed under the Code of Civil Procedure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

ZPP 343. odst. 2; ZPP 352. in 365. 1. točka: An appeal filed after the expiration of the statutory limitation period is inadmissible and must be dismissed without substantive examination.

Keywords

AI generated
time-barred appeal statutory limitation period inadmissible appeal Code of Civil Procedure procedural deadline

Cited Legislation

AI generated
343. odstavek 343. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku
352. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku
1. točka 365. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku
AI generated
VSL sodba IV Cp 302/2013
Divorce appeal dismissed; court held unilateral desire to end marriage makes union unsustainable per freedom of conscience.
VSL sodba I Cp 969/00
Appeal dismissed; failure to receive notice of hearing postponement means the hearing proceeds and absence is the party's responsibility.
VSL Sklep IV Cp 399/2021
Appeal dismissed; divorce granted due to irretrievable breakdown from intolerable communication and lack of partnership recognition.
Sodba II Ips 277/2002
Appeal dismissed; contract validity challenged by disputed facts requires separate suit, not appeal.
VSRS Sklep II DoR 171/2022
Supreme Court dismisses appeal permission request due to lack of lawyer's signature and proof of bar exam.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

Pritožba je prepozna, če je vložena po preteku zakonskega roka zanjo. Prepozno pritožbo je potrebno zavreči.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Z izpodbijano sodbo je sodišče prve stopnje razvezalo zakonsko zvezo, ki sta jo dne 9.4.1982 v Ljubljani sklenili pravdni stranki.

Zoper to sodbo se je laično pritožil toženec.

Pritožba je prepozna.

Iz spisu priključene povratnice, ki je javna listina, izhaja, da je toženec sodbo sodišča prve stopnje prejel dne 27.12.1999, pritožbo proti sodbi pa je vložil dne 12.1.2000, torej že po poteku petnajstdnevnega prekluzivnega roka za vložitev pritožbe.

Toženčeva pritožba, ki je vložena po preteku zakonskega roka, je torej prepozna (drugi odstavek 343. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku; ZPP) in zato jo je sodišče druge stopnje na podlagi določila 352. člena ZPP zavrglo, saj je vsebinsko ne sme obravnavati (1. točka 365. člena ZPP).