Legislator Case Law & Legislation
VSL sklep II Cp 97/2000 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2000:II.CP.97.2000 AI generated

Court dismisses appeal when plaintiff withdraws it before the appellate court decides.

Case Number VSL sklep II Cp 97/2000
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court concluded the legal proceedings by noting the plaintiff withdrew their appeal. Although the first-instance court had suspended the counterclaim process, the plaintiff timely lodged an appeal which they subsequently withdrew before a decision was made. The court ruled that this withdrawal, permitted under the Code of Civil Procedure, legally terminated the entire procedure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

2. odstavek 334. člen ZPP; When a party withdraws an appeal before the appellate court renders a decision, the court must conclude the proceedings by noting the withdrawal.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of appeal termination of proceedings Code of Civil Procedure appellate court decision procedural conclusion

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se, da je tožeča stranka pritožbo umaknila.

[JEDRO]

Ker je tožena stranka pred odločitvijo o pritožbi le to umaknila, je pritožbeno sodišče z ugotovitvijo umika zaključilo pravdni postopek.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Z izpodbijanim sklepom je sodišče prve stopnje zaradi umika nasprotne tožbe postopek glede nasprotne tožbe ustavilo.

Zoper ta sklep je tožeča stranka vložila pravočasno pritožbo. Pred odločitvijo o pritožbi pa je slednjo umaknila, kar je po določbi 2. odstavka 334. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) dovoljeno.

Pritožbeno sodišče je zato, z ugotovitvijo umika pritožbe zaključilo pravdni postopek.