Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL sklep I Kp 211/2000 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2000:I.KP.211.2000 AI generated

Appeal dismissed because higher prosecutor withdrew lower prosecutor's appeal under ZKP Article 368.35.5.

Case Number VSL sklep I Kp 211/2000
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal filed by the District State Prosecutor against a first-instance acquittal. The District Prosecutor argued the lower court erred in fact-finding regarding the defendant's actions, while the Higher Prosecutor intervened to withdraw the appeal. The court rejected the appeal as inadmissible because the Higher Prosecutor formally withdrew it, rendering the appeal procedurally void under Article 390 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 368.35.5 of the Criminal Procedure Act; Article 390 of the Criminal Procedure Act: An appeal is inadmissible if the higher state prosecutor withdraws the appeal filed by the lower state prosecutor.

Keywords

AI generated
Criminal Procedure Act procedural inadmissibility prosecutor withdrawal appeal dismissal state prosecutor appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 368.35.5 of the Criminal Procedure Act
Article 390 of the Criminal Procedure Act
AI generated
VSL sodba I Kp 195/2000
Court dismisses prosecution charges because the described conduct lacks elements of the crime of illegal border crossing.
Sodba I Ips 177/96
Supreme Court dismisses appeal against conviction, ruling refusal to supplement expert opinion did not violate right to evidence.
VSM sodba I Kp 842/2005
Appeal dismissed; self-defense justified due to disproportionate counter-attack by victim and witnesses.
VSL sklep I Kp 212/2000
Appeal granted; lower court acquitted based on incomplete psychiatric expert report lacking independent fact-finding.
VSL sodba I Kp 709/99
Appeal dismissed; court upheld conviction for severe bodily injury based on medical evidence of direct blow.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba okrožne državne tožilke se zavrže kot nedovoljena.

[JEDRO]

Ker je višja državna tožilka umaknila pritožbo okrožne državne tožilke, je sodišče druge stopnje pritožbo zavrglo kot nedovoljeno.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Okrožno sodišče v Kranju je z izpodbijano sodbo v prvem delu obtoženca iz razloga po 3. tč. 358. čl. ZKP oprostilo obtožbe, da naj bi storil kaznivo dejanje posebno hude telesne poškodbe po čl. 135/4 v zvezi s 1. odst. 135. čl. in v zvezi s 3. odst. 11. čl. ter 2. odst. 3. čl. KZ. V drugem delu pa je po 1. tč. 357. čl. ZKP izdalo zavrnilno sodbo.

Proti navedeni sodbi se je v zvezi z oprostilnim delom pritožila okrožna državna tožilka zaradi zmotne ugotovitve dejanskega stanja.

Predlagala je ugoditev pritožbi in spremembo izpodbijane sodbe tako, da naj se obtožencu izreče obsodilno sodbo in da naj se mu odpusti kazen.

V zvezi s pritožbo okrožne državne tožilke je višja državna tožilka podala izjavo, opr. št. Ktm-1 174/00 z dne 13.3.2000, da glede na določilo 5. odst. 368. čl. ZKP umika pritožbo okrožne državne tožilke.

Ker je prišlo do umika pritožbe, je sodišče druge stopnje pritožbo okrožne državne tožilke iz Kranja zavrglo kot nedovoljeno, kar je v skladu z določilom čl. 390 ZKP.