Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL sklep I Cpg 278/2000 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2000:I.CPG.278.2000 AI generated

Appeal dismissed because no appeal exists against a court ruling on jurisdictional competence.

Case Number VSL sklep I Cpg 278/2000
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Higher Court dismissed the appeal lodged against the District Court's ruling on jurisdictional competence. The District Court correctly determined that the District Court, not the Okrajno court, had jurisdiction over the economic dispute between two companies under the Civil Procedure Act. Consequently, the Higher Court rejected the appeal as inadmissible because the law explicitly prohibits appeals against rulings on jurisdictional competence.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 3, paragraph 19 of the Civil Procedure Act; Article 1, paragraph 343 of the Civil Procedure Act: No appeal is permitted against a court's ruling on jurisdictional competence; such rulings are final and binding.

Keywords

AI generated
jurisdictional competence civil procedure act economic disputes inadmissible appeal finality of rulings

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 3, paragraph 19 of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 1, paragraph 343 of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 1, paragraph 165 of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 4, paragraph 2, paragraph 30 of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 6, paragraph 32 of the Civil Procedure Act
AI generated
VSL sklep I Cp 1392/2016
Appeal allowed: Property dispute not a bankruptcy-related economic dispute despite mass impact.
VSM Sklep I Cp 1023/2018
Appeal dismissed; business dispute rules apply to lawyer error claims where both parties are business entities.
VSM sklep R 21/2017
High Court rules that a dispute between a shareholder and a company is a commercial case under the ZPP.
VSL Sklep I Cpg 258/2020
Appeal dismissed; joint debtors' appeal rejected due to lack of personal legal interest in jurisdictional ruling.
VSL sklep R 748/2005
Court rules district court has jurisdiction over lease disputes between legal entities under ZPP Art. 481.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba se zavrže.

Zahtevek tožene stranke za povrnitev stroškov pritožbenega postopka se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Zoper sklep okrožnega sodišča, s katerim se je izreklo za stvarno pristojno, ni pritožbe.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje se je z izpodbijanim sklepom izreklo za stvarno pristojno za odločanje. Ker sta obe pravdni stranki gospodarski družbi, je ocenilo, da za predmetni postopek veljajo pravila o postopku v gospodarskih sporih (1. odst. 481. čl. ZPP). Zato kljub določilu 4. tč. 2. odst. 30. čl. ZPP okrajno sodišče v tem sporu ni pristojno za odločitev, saj je po določilu 6. tč. 32. čl. istega zakona okrožno sodišče tisto, ko odloča o gospodarskih sporih.

Proti sklepu je tožena stranka vložila pravočasno pritožbo s predlogom, naj višje sodišče zaradi kršitve določil pravdnega postopka ta sklep razveljavi.

Pritožba ni dovoljena.

Po določilu 3. odst. 19. čl. ZPP zoper sklep okrožnega sodišča, s katerim se je izreklo za stvarno pristojno, ni pritožbe. Zato je pritožbeno sodišče na podlagi določila 1. odst. 343. čl. ZPP pritožbo kot nedovoljeno zavrglo, o stroških pritožbenega postopka pa odločilo na podlagi določila 1. odst. 165. čl. ZPP.