Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL sklep I Kp 1393/99 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2000:I.KP.1393.99 AI generated

Appeal dismissed because defendant failed to notify appeal within the 8-day statutory period.

Case Number VSL sklep I Kp 1393/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal rejected the defendant's appeal as inadmissible due to a procedural failure to notify the court within the required timeframe. Although the first-instance court dismissed the appeal, the defendant argued for a re-evaluation of the underlying judgment, while the prosecution supported the dismissal. The court ruled that the defendant and their counsel missed the eight-day notification deadline established by law, thereby forfeiting their right to appeal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

čl. 368/II ZKP; An appeal filed after the expiration of the statutory eight-day notification period is deemed waived, and the court is correct to reject it as inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal appeal procedure statutory notification period waiver of appeal rights inadmissible appeal procedural forfeiture

Cited Legislation

AI generated
čl. 368/II ZKP
Zato je sodišče prve stopnje nenapovedano pritožbo pravilno zavrglo kot nedovoljeno, saj je štelo po čl. 368/II ZKP, da se je obtoženec odpovedal pravici do pritožbe zoper sodbo, ki je bila razglašena dne 19.10.1999.
AI generated
VSM sklep Cpg 285/96
Appeal allowed; preliminary objection based on res judicata is inadmissible before preparatory hearing.
VSL Sklep II Cp 1741/2023
Appeal dismissed because court fees must be paid for both first and second instance proceedings under ZPP. The court ruled the plaintiff's claim for a single fee payment was invalid. The decision confirms that procedural prerequisites for appeals require fresh fee payment. The court rejected arguments regarding unreasonable fee requirements and lack of legal protection. The ruling emphasizes strict adherence to statutory fee payment rules in Slovenian civil procedure. The plaintiff's failure to pay the required fee resulted in the dismissal of the appeal.
VSC Sklep PRp 3/2023
Appeal dismissed because only the prosecution can challenge a second-instance court decision under the Offenses Act.
VSL Sklep Cst 342/2018
Appeal dismissed; appeal by attorney via mail rejected under electronic filing rules for insolvency proceedings.
VSL sklep I Kp 729/99
Appeal dismissed because the victim's representative failed to file a formal notice of appeal within the statutory deadline.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba obt. H. H. se zavrne kot neutemeljena.

[JEDRO]

Sodišče prve stopnje je pravilno zavrglo kot nedovoljeno pritožbo obtoženca, ki je ni v zakonskem roku 8 dni napovedal.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Okrožno sodišče v ... je z izpodbijanim sklepom kot nedovoljeno zavrglo pritožbo obtoženca zoper sodbo opr. št. I K ..z dne 19.10.1999. Proti temu sklepu se je pritožil obtoženec in je predlagal, da naj sodišče njegovo pritožbo dopusti in nato ponovno oceni sodbo, ki jo je hotel izpodbijati.

Višja državna tožilka je predlagala zavrnitev pritožbe kot neutemeljene.

Pritožba ni utemeljena.

Sodišče druge stopnje ugotavlja, da je sodišče prve stopnje je pravilno ugotovilo, da obtoženec in njegov zagovornik v roku 8 dni od razglasitve sodbe, na kateri sta bila navzoča, nista napovedala pritožbe. Ta rok je tekel do 27.10.1999, obtoženec pa se je pritožil dne 4.11.1999. Zato je sodišče prve stopnje nenapovedano pritožbo pravilno zavrglo kot nedovoljeno, saj je štelo po čl. 368/II ZKP, da se je obtoženec odpovedal pravici do pritožbe zoper sodbo, ki je bila razglašena dne 19.10.1999. Glede na navedeno je zato obtoženčeva pritožba neutemeljena in jo je sodišče druge stopnje zavrnilo.