Legislator Case Law & Legislation
VSL sklep I Cpg 1561/99 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2000:I.CPG.1561.99 AI generated

Court dismisses appeal as defendant withdrew it, noting withdrawal is irrevocable under ZPP. Appeal withdrawn by defendant; court confirms withdrawal is final per ZPP. Court rules withdrawal is irrevocable under ZPP, dismissing appeal as fact. Withdrawal of appeal is final under ZPP, leading to dismissal of appeal.

Case Number VSL sklep I Cpg 1561/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the appeal because the defendant withdrew it on February 18, 2000. The defendant's representative submitted a request to withdraw the appeal, which the court accepted as final under the third paragraph of Article 334 of the Civil Procedure Act. Since the withdrawal is irrevocable, the appellate court merely confirmed this fact and did not review the merits of the original judgment.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 334, paragraph 3 of the Civil Procedure Act; Withdrawal of an appeal is irrevocable, and the appellate court's sole function is to confirm the fact of withdrawal.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of appeal irrevocable withdrawal Civil Procedure Act appellate procedure finality of withdrawal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 334, paragraph 3 of the Civil Procedure Act

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se, da je tožena stranka pritožbo umaknila.

[JEDRO]

Ker je po tretjem odst. 334. čl. ZPP umik pritožbe nepreklicen, je pritožbeno sodišče s tem sklepom le ugotovilo dejstvo umika.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Zoper uvodoma citirano sodbo je tožena stranka vložila pritožbo.

Dne 18.2.2000 pa je pritožbeno sodišče prejelo vlogo pooblaščenca tožene stranke, s katero pritožbo umika. Ker je po tretjem odst. 334. čl. ZPP umik pritožbe nepreklicen, je pritožbeno sodišče s tem sklepom le ugotovilo dejstvo umika.