Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL sklep III Cp 1674/99 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2000:III.CP.1674.99 AI generated

Late objection to enforcement decision filed after eight-day deadline is dismissed as untimely.

Case Number VSL sklep III Cp 1674/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the defendant's objection to the enforcement decision because it was filed on August 28, 1999, exceeding the statutory eight-day deadline. The enforcement order was served on August 17, 1999, making August 25 the final day for submission, yet the defendant mailed the objection three days later. Consequently, the court ruled that the objection was procedurally invalid and rejected it in accordance with the Enforcement Act and Civil Procedure Code.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o izvršbi in zavarovanju, 3. odstavek 9. člena; Zakon o pravdnem postopku, 352. člen: An objection to an enforcement decision filed after the statutory eight-day period is inadmissible and must be rejected.

Keywords

AI generated
enforcement objection statutory deadline procedural inadmissibility service of process time limit compliance

Cited Legislation

AI generated
3. odstavek 9. člena Zakona o izvršbi in zavarovanju
352. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku
15. člen Zakona o izvršbi in zavarovanju

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugovor se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

Ugovor zoper sklep o izvršbi, ki je vložen enajsti dan po vročitvi sklepa dolžniku, se kot prepozen zavrže.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Zakon o izvršbi in zavarovanju (ZIZ) v 3. odstavku 9. člena določa, da je treba ugovor zoper sklep o izvršbi vložiti v osmih dneh od vročitve sklepa. Dolžnici je bil sklep o izvršbi vročen 17.8.1999 (povratnica pri red. št. 2 spisa) in je bil torej zadnji dan navedenega roka torek 25.8.1999. Dolžnica pa je, kot je razvidno iz podatkov v spisu, ugovor oddala priporočeno po pošti šele 28.8.1999. Ker je tako ugovor vložen po izteku ugovornega roka, ga je moralo sodišče druge stopnje v skladu z določilom 352. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku, v zvezi s 15. členom ZIZ, zavreči.