Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep I R 27/98 ECLI:SI:VSRS:1998:I.R.27.98 AI generated

Supreme Court transfers jurisdiction to district court due to plaintiff's employment at the court.

Case Number Sklep I R 27/98
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia transferred jurisdiction from the District Court to the District Court in R. The plaintiff, an extramarital partner of the defendant, filed a claim for confirmation of co-ownership of an apartment and a provisional order, while the defendant was employed as a typist at the very court handling the case. The court ruled that under Article 68 of the Civil Procedure Act, such a transfer is justified when it is evident that proceeding elsewhere would facilitate the process or other significant reasons exist, which were objectively demonstrated in this instance.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 68 of the Civil Procedure Act; The Supreme Court may transfer jurisdiction to another competent court if it is evident that the proceedings would be easier conducted there or if other significant reasons warrant delegation.

Keywords

AI generated
transfer of jurisdiction Civil Procedure Act court employment provisional order co-ownership claim procedural efficiency delegation of authority

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 68 of the Civil Procedure Act
AI generated
Sklep I R 22/2006
Appeal dismissed: Friendship between judges and lawyer's conflict of interest does not justify transfer of jurisdiction.
VSL Sodba I Cp 2318/2018
Appeal dismissed; tenant evicted from co-owned property as owner proved title and tenant failed to justify possession.
VSM Sodba I Cp 839/2019
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first instance ruling on co-ownership rights versus privacy and dwelling inviolability.
VSL sklep I Cp 871/2015
Appeal court vacates first-instance judgment for failure to serve plaintiff's amendment regarding co-ownership status.
Sodba II Ips 556/98
Court rejects appeal claiming adverse possession rights override land registry entry when buyer knew of prior acquisition.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Za odločanje v tej zadevi se določi Okrajno sodišče v R.

[JEDRO]

Prenos pristojnosti zaradi zaposlitve stranke na sodišču.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Pri Okrajnem sodišču na ... je tožnik A. P. proti toženki A. A. vložil tožbo na ugotovitev solastnine na stanovanju s predlogom za izdajo začasne odredbe.

Okrajno sodišče na ... je dne 11.5.1998 po predstojnici predlagalo določitev drugega stvarno pristojnega sodišča v skladu z določbo 68. člena ZPP, ker naj bi tožnik bil izvenzakonski partner toženke, ki pa je zaposlena kot strojepiska - zapisnikarica na sodišču, pred katerim naj bi se vodil postopek.

Predlog je utemeljen.

Po 68. členu ZPP lahko Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije na predlog stranke ali pristojnega sodišča odloči, naj postopa v posamezni zadevi drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče, če je očitno, da se bo tako laže opravil postopek, ali če so za to drugi tehtni razlogi. Obstoj slednjega, torej tehtnih razlogov, ki pogojujejo delegacijo pristojnosti, je iz vloge Okrajnega sodišča ... razviden in objektivno izkazan. Za odločanje v tej zadevi je bilo zato delegirano Okrajno sodišče v R.