Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL sklep III Cp 1835/99 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:1999:III.CP.1835.99 AI generated

Appeal dismissed because creditor failed to submit correct debtor name within statutory enforcement deadline.

Case Number VSL sklep III Cp 1835/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal against the first-instance court's decision to reject the creditor's enforcement request. The creditor argued they could not provide the correct debtor's name because they had not received the relevant court order, yet the appeal was rejected as unfounded. The court determined that the creditor had received the order and the deadline for submitting the correct debtor's name had expired, making the first-instance ruling legally sound.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

člen 365/2 ZPP/99 v zvezi s čl. 15 ZIZ: An appeal is inadmissible when the creditor fails to submit the correct debtor's name within the statutory period, resulting in the rejection of the enforcement request.

Keywords

AI generated
enforcement procedure debtor identification statutory deadline rejection of request appeal dismissal civil procedure law procedural default

Cited Legislation

AI generated
člen 365/2 ZPP/99 v zvezi s čl. 15 ZIZ
Neutemeljeno pritožbo je bilo tako treba zavrniti in potrditi pravilno odločitev sodišča prve stopnje (člen 365/2 ZPP/99 v zvezi s čl. 15 ZIZ).
AI generated
VSL sklep II Cpg 778/2001
Enforcement order against unregistered sole proprietor must be served personally at residence, not business address.
VSL sklep II Cpg 282/2000
Appeal partially allowed; seizure and bank transfer halted due to procedural violation regarding new debtor address.
VSL sklep Cpg 216/95
Appeal allowed; court quashed first instance ruling for procedural error in enforcement proceedings regarding debtor address.
VSL sklep III Cp 947/99
Appeal dismissed because procedural errors regarding court address cannot justify time limit extensions under ZIZ Art. 36.
VSL sklep II Cpg 594/2000
Appeal dismissed; uplinker must prove exhaustive search for debtor's address before court can assist.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba se zavrne kot neutemeljena in se izpodbijani sklep potrdi.

[JEDRO]

Ker upnik v roku ni dopolnil predloga za izvršbo z navedbo pravilnega dolžnikovega naslova, je sodišče prve stopnje ravnalo prav, ko je predlog zavrglo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje je z izpodbijanim sklepom ustavilo izvršbo, sklep o izvršbi razveljavilo in predlog zavrglo, ker upnik ni v roku sporočil pravilnega dolžnikovega naslova.

Proti sklepu se upnica pritožuje. Navaja, da upnica ni prejela sklepa, na katerega se sklicuje sodišče, zato ni imela možnosti sporočiti naslova.

Pritožba ni utemeljena.

Iz podatkov v spisu izhaja, da pritožbene trditve niso točne. Sodišče prve stopnje je s sklepom z dne 26.4.1999 upnici naložilo, da v treh mesecih sporoči pravilen naslov dolžnika. Iz povratnice, pripete k temu sklepu - red. št. 5 - izhaja, da je upnica prejela sklep 30. aprila 1999, sodišče prve stopnje pa je sklep o zavrženju izdalo po preteku roka. Tako je odločitev sodišča prve stopnje pravilna iz razlogov, ki jih je zapisalo sodišče prve stopnje.

Neutemeljeno pritožbo je bilo tako treba zavrniti in potrditi pravilno odločitev sodišča prve stopnje (člen 365/2 ZPP/99 v zvezi s čl. 15 ZIZ).