Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL sklep I Cp 2018/99 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:1999:I.CP.2018.99 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; court must send inheritance case to trial for the heir with less probable claim to validity.

Case Number VSL sklep I Cp 2018/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal by the deceased's son, confirming the first-instance court's decision to send the inheritance case to trial. The son argued he was disinherited and the will was invalid due to lack of genuine intent and a forged signature. The court ruled that the procedural step to determine the will's validity must be directed toward the party with the less probable claim, not the appellant's preferred outcome.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

čl. 210/2 tč. 1 in čl. 213/1 Zakona o dedovanju; When a will's validity is contested, the court must direct the inheritance case to trial regarding that validity against the heir whose claim of invalidity is considered less probable.

Keywords

AI generated
inheritance procedure will validity trial direction less probable claim disinheritment timing appeal dismissal testamentary capacity

Cited Legislation

AI generated
čl. 210/2 tč. 1 Zakona o dedovanju
čl. 213/1 Zakona o dedovanju
1 in čl. 213/1 Zakona o dedovanju (Ur.
čl. 365/2 ZPP
čl. 163 ZD
365/2 ZPP v zvezi s čl. 163 ZD).
AI generated
VSL sodba I Cp 1295/93
Inheritance law: testamentary capacity presumed; doubt insufficient, certainty required to overturn presumption.
VDSS Sklep Psp 207/2023
Appeal dismissed for late filing due to lack of evidence disputing statutory service date in home locker.
VDS sklep Psp 1260/2002
Appeal allowed; first instance court erred by rejecting time limit extension without a hearing on evidence.
Sodba II Ips 816/2009
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; burden of proving testator's mistake lies with plaintiff under inheritance law.
VDSS sklep Pdp 1419/2014
Appeal granted; first-instance dismissal reversed due to untimely administrative commission decision and procedural defect.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba se zavrne kot neutemeljena in se potrdi sklep sodišča prve stopnje.

[JEDRO]

Na pot pravde zaradi neveljavnosti oporoke sodišče napoti tistega dediča katerega pravico šteje za manj verjetno.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Z izpodbijanim sklepom je sodišče prve stopnje prekinilo zapuščinski postopek ter zapustnikovega sina A. F. napotilo na pot pravde zaradi neveljavnosti oporoke.

Zoper tak sklep se pritožuje zapustnikov sin A. F., ki v pritožbi predlaga, da pritožbeno sodišče ugodi njegovi pritožbi ter na pot pravde napoti M. F. P. V pritožbi zapustnikov sin navaja, da ga v oporoki pokojni oče razdedinja in bi morala biti na pot pravde napotena oporočna dedinja.

Pritožba ni utemeljena.

Zapustnikov sin A. F. na zapuščinski obravnavi ni priznal veljavnosti oporoke zapustnika, ker ne odraža njegove prave volje in da podpis na oporoki ni zapustnikov. Sodišče prve stopnje je v skladu z določili čl. 210/2 tč. 1 in čl. 213/1 Zakona o dedovanju (Ur. list SRS 15/76 - 23/78) pravilno izdalo izpodbijani sklep. Napotitev na pravdo velja samo glede veljavnosti oporoke. Razdedinjenje zapustnikovega sina ni predmet obravnavanja v tej fazi postopka kot se zmotno sklicuje zapustnikov sin v pritožbi. O slednjem bo sodišče odločalo šele, če bo ugotovljeno, da je oporoka veljavna.

Glede na navedeno je bilo pritožbo zapustnikovega sina zavrniti kot neutemeljeno in potrditi pravilen sklep sodišča prve stopnje (čl.

365/2 ZPP v zvezi s čl. 163 ZD).