Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSK sklep Cpg 398/99 ECLI:SI:VSKP:1999:CPG.398.99 AI generated

Appeal dismissed because creditor withdrew enforcement request, losing legal interest to challenge the withdrawal order.

Case Number VSK sklep Cpg 398/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The first-instance court declared the enforcement request withdrawn due to the creditor's failure to submit proof of tax payment within the statutory deadline. The creditor appealed this decision, claiming they had paid the tax and submitted proof on June 21, 1999. The appellate court rejected the appeal because the creditor had formally withdrawn the enforcement request on August 5, 1999, thereby extinguishing any legal interest to contest the subsequent order regarding the withdrawal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) 366. člen; Zakon o izvršbi in zavarovanju (ZIZ) 15. člen: If a creditor withdraws an enforcement request after filing an appeal against a decision declaring it withdrawn, the appeal is inadmissible due to the lack of legal interest.

Keywords

AI generated
enforcement withdrawal legal interest inadmissible appeal creditor rights procedural termination

Cited Legislation

AI generated
366. člen v zvezi s 3. odst. 343. in 352. členom Zakona o pravdnem postopku - ZPP
To pa je razlog za ustavitev izvršbe, tako da upnik za pritožbo zoper sklep o ustavitvi izvršbe nima več pravnega interesa (366. člen v zvezi s 3. odst. 343. in 352. členom Zakona o pravdnem postopku - ZPP v zvezi s 15.
15. člen Zakona o izvršbi in zavarovanju - ZIZ
AI generated
VSL sklep III Cp 1577/99
Court allows appeal against enforcement request dismissal due to proven court fee payment.
VSL sklep II Cpg 1365/99
Court dismisses withdrawal of enforcement request when court fee was paid within the statutory extension period.
VSL sklep II Cpg 693/99
Appeal allowed; court reversed first instance for failing to recognize timely tax payment as a valid execution request.
VSL sklep IV Cp 689/2016
Appeal dismissed; general ZPP rules apply to family law cases unless specific provisions exist.
VSL sklep I Cp 418/2009
Appeal dismissed; late court fee payment via bank hours deemed non-compliant despite timely order submission.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba upnika se z a v r ž e .

[JEDRO]

Če je upnik, potem, ko je vložil pritožbo zoper sklep, po katerem se šteje izvršilni predlog za umaknjen, izvršilni predlog umaknil, je njegova pritožba nedovoljena, ker zanjo nima več pravnega interesa.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Z izpodbijanim sklepom je sodišče prve stopnje štelo, da je predlog za izvršbo umaknjen, potem ko je ugotovilo, da upnik v določenem 15-dnevnem roku predloga ni dopolnil tako, da bi predložil sodišču potrdilo o plačani taksi.

Zoper ta sklep je upnik vložil pritožbo in predlagal njegovo razveljavitev. V pritožbi je navajal, da je dne 21.6.1999 plačal zahtevano takso in tudi dostavil sodišču prve stopnje dokaz o plačilu.

Pritožba upnika ni dovoljena.

Pritožbeno sodišče ugotavlja, da je upnik z vlogo z dne 5.8.1999 umaknil izvršilni predlog v celoti. To pa je razlog za ustavitev izvršbe, tako da upnik za pritožbo zoper sklep o ustavitvi izvršbe nima več pravnega interesa (366. člen v zvezi s 3. odst. 343. in 352. členom Zakona o pravdnem postopku - ZPP v zvezi s 15. členom Zakona o izvršbi in zavarovanju - ZIZ).