Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL sklep I Cp 1811/99 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:1999:I.CP.1811.99 AI generated

Appeal dismissed as filed after expiration of 15-day statutory limitation period under ZPP.

Case Number VSL sklep I Cp 1811/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal because it was filed after the expiration of the 15-day limitation period. The appellant's lawyer received the first-instance judgment on August 17, 1999, but submitted the appeal on September 6, 1999, missing the deadline. The court ruled that appeals must be rejected as untimely when filed beyond the statutory period prescribed by the Civil Procedure Act.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

348. člen ZPP; 358. člen ZPP: Appeals filed after the expiration of the statutory limitation period must be rejected as untimely.

Keywords

AI generated
statutory limitation period civil procedure act untimely appeal preclusive deadline court of appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
348. člen ZPP
358. člen ZPP
AI generated
VDSS sklep Pdp 1133/2013
Appeal dismissed because a judgment served on the first day of court holidays starts the appeal clock the next day.
VSL sklep II Cp 44/2012
Appeal allowed; payment of court fee installments is not a prerequisite for hearing the appeal.
VDSS sklep Pdp 1134/2013
Appeal dismissed because the appeal was filed after the statutory deadline expired. The court confirmed the first-instance court's decision. The appeal was rejected as untimely. The court ruled the appeal was filed too late. The appeal was rejected due to procedural timeliness. The appeal was dismissed for being untimely. The appeal was rejected as it was filed after the deadline. The appeal was dismissed because it was filed too late. The appeal was rejected due to the expiration of the appeal period.
Sklep X Ips 234/2007
Supreme Court dismisses review appeal by non-lawyer client lacking standing under administrative litigation law.
VSL sklep I Cp 1537/2015
Appeal allowed: joint co-plaintiffs pay one appeal fee collectively despite separate filings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

Ker je stranka vložila pritožbo po preteku 15-dnevnega prekluzivnega roka, je bilo treba pritožbo zavreči kot prepozno.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje je izdalo sodbo na podlagi pripoznave in sodbo, oboje z dne 13.7.1999. Prvotožena stranka ima v zadevi odvetnika (pooblastilo priloga B1), zato mu je sodišče prve stopnje vročilo odločbo. Pooblaščenec prvotožene stranke je odločbo prejel 17.8.1999 (povratnica pripeta k sodbi). Drugotožena stranka je sama vložila pritožbo. Pritožba je oddana priporočeno na pošti 6.9.1999 (primerjaj kuverto pripeto k pritožbi), kar je vse prispelo na sodišče 7.9.1999. Ker je bila pošta oddana po preteku prekluzivnega 15-dnevnega roka (348. čl.

ZPP), je prepozna. Prepozno pritožbo pa mora pritožbeno sodišče zavreči (358. čl. ZPP).