Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL sklep III Cp 1852/99 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:1999:III.CP.1852.99 AI generated

Appeal allowed when defendant objects only to enforcement costs, treating it as a full appeal under ZIZ Art. 53.

Case Number VSL sklep III Cp 1852/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court granted the appeal and partially revoked the first-instance enforcement order regarding the attorney's fees. The defendant objected solely to the excessive cost allocation, arguing the lawyer was not entitled to 50 points for document review and 50 points for receiving the decision under the applicable tariff. The court ruled that such a limited objection constitutes a full appeal under Article 53 of the Enforcement Act, allowing the review of the entire enforcement decision and correcting the erroneous application of the fee schedule.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 53 ZIZ; Art. 365(3) ZPP: If a party objects only to the enforcement costs, the objection is treated as an appeal, permitting a full review of the enforcement decision to correct errors in the cost allocation.

Keywords

AI generated
enforcement appeal cost allocation attorney fees limited objection ZIZ Article 53 ZPP Article 365 fee schedule error

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 53 ZIZ
Art. 350 ZPP
Art. 366 ZPP
Art. 15 ZIZ
Art. 365(3) ZPP
AI generated
VSL sklep III Cp 1570/99
Appeal dismissed: Late alimony payment does not stop enforcement; creditor gets response costs.
VSL sodba II Cp 759/99
Appeal dismissed; appeal court upheld first instance judgment regarding unpaid construction work under Housing Act. Appeal rejected due to lack of evidence and procedural errors. Court confirmed obligation to pay based on Housing Act provisions.
VSL sklep II Cpg 1016/99
Appeal dismissed; creditor may advance payment before enforcement ruling under ZIZ Art. 46(3) for bank account seizures.
VSL sklep III Cp 1627/99
Appeal court dismisses enforcement request because the enforcement order is not a valid enforcement title against the guarantor.
VSL sklep III Cp 1892/99
Enforcement of notarized debt dismissed; debt due and debtor agreed to direct enforceability.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožbi se ugodi in se sklep o izvršbi v stroškovnem delu razveljavi za znesek 8.740,00 SIT z zakonitimi zamudnimi obrestmi od 28.9.1999 dalje.

[JEDRO]

Če pritožnik ugovarja zgolj stroškovni odmeri, je tak ugovor obravnavati kot pritožbo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Z izpodbijanim sklepom je sodišče prve stopnje na predlog upnice, na podlagi pravnomočnega sklepa Višjega delovnega in socialnega sodišča v Ljubljani, opr. št. Pdp 1421/98 z dne 28.5.1999 zoper dolžnico dovolilo izvršbo zaradi izterjave glavnice v znesku 36.193,00 SIT z zakonitimi zamudnimi obrestmi od 20.6.1999 dalje do plačila in izvršilnih stroškov, katere je odmerilo v znesku 23.384,00 SIT z zakonitimi zamudnimi obrestmi od 28.9.1999 dalje do plačila.

Dolžnica v svojem ugovoru zoper sklep izpobija le njegov stroškovni del. Uveljavlja, da upnici po veljavni odvetniški tarifi ne gre 50 točk za pregled listin in posvet s stranko, prav tako kot tudi ne 50 točk za prejem in pregled odločbe. Smiselno predlaga razveljavitev izpodbijanega dela sklepa.

Pritožba je utemeljena.

Sodišče druge stopnje je dolžničin ugovor zoper sklep o izvršbi, glede na to, da v njem izpodbija le njegov stroškovni del, obravnavalo kot pritožbo ob smiselnem upoštevanju določb 53. člena Zakona o izvršbi in zavarovanju (ZIZ). Nadaljni preizkus izpodbijanega sklepa v okviru določb 350. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) v zvezi z njegovim 366. členom in 15. členom ZIZ pa je še pokazal, da je sodišče prve stopnje napačno uporabilo materialno pravo, ko je upnici prizalo 50 točk za pregled listin in posvet in nadaljnjih 50 točk za prejem in pregled odločbe po odvetniški tarifi, ker slednja (glej Ur. l. RS, št. 7/95) priznanja takih postavk ne predvideva. Zato je sodišče druge stopnje pritožbi ugodilo in izpodbijani del sklepa razveljavilo v skladu z določbo 3. točke 365. člena ZPP.