Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL sklep II Cpg 917/99 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:1999:II.CPG.917.99 AI generated

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn because second instance court had not yet issued its decision when withdrawal occurred.

Case Number VSL sklep II Cpg 917/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The second instance court declared the appeal withdrawn because it had not yet issued its decision on the merits when the appellant withdrew the appeal. The first instance court had suspended enforcement pending a Supreme Court review, and the appellant formally withdrew the appeal on November 5, 1999. Consequently, the court applied the relevant procedural provisions to rule that the appeal was no longer valid.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku 2. odst. 349. člena; Zakon o izvršbi in izpodbijanju izvršbe 14. člen: An appeal is deemed withdrawn if the higher court has not yet rendered a decision on the merits at the time of withdrawal.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural withdrawal second instance court suspended enforcement appeal dismissal ZPP 349. člen

Cited Legislation

AI generated
2. odst. 349. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku
Sodišče druge stopnje do dneva, ko je bila pritožba umaknjena še ni izdalo odločbe, zato je skladno z 2. odst. 349. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku, v nadaljevanju ZPP/77 v zvezi s 15.
14. člen Zakona o izvršbi in izpodbijanju izvršbe
AI generated
VSL sklep II Cp 602/2009
Court allows appeal against enforcement ruling, ruling partners are successors to dissolved company assets.
VSK sklep II Cpg 187/2005
Appeal partially allowed; lower court erred by rejecting revocation request without substantive review under ZIZ Art. 42(3).
VSK sklep Cpg 560/99
Court voids enforcement order for missing court name and dismisses debtor's objection as unsubstantiated.
VSC sklep Cp 314/2011
Appeal dismissed because applicant is not a lawyer and the disputed property value is under 25,000 EUR.
VSC sklep I Ip 73/2008
Appeal allowed; court annuls execution stay due to post-bankruptcy contract with individual debtor not in bankruptcy estate.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se, da je pritožba umaknjena.

[JEDRO]

Ker do dneva, ko je bila pritožba umaknjena, sodišče druge stopnje odločbe še ni izdalo, je v skladu z 2. odst. 349. člena ZPP v zvezi s 14. členom ZIZ ugotovilo, da je pritožba umaknjena.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje je 22.02.1999 z izpodbijanim sklepom odločilo, da se izvršba dovoljena s sklepom o izvršbi opr. št. In .. z dne 04.02.1999 odloži do odločitve Vrhovnega sodišča Republike Slovenije o reviziji.

Upnik se je zoper navedeni sklep pravočasno pritožil dne 08.03.1999, nato pa pritožbo dne 05.11.1999 umaknil.

Sodišče druge stopnje do dneva, ko je bila pritožba umaknjena še ni izdalo odločbe, zato je skladno z 2. odst. 349. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku, v nadaljevanju ZPP/77 v zvezi s 15. členom ZIZ ugotovilo, da je upnik pritožbo umaknil.

Določbe ZPP/77 (Ur.l. SFRJ, št. 4/77, 36/77, 36/80, 69/82, 58/84, 74/87, 14/88, 57/89, 20/90 in 27/90) je sodišče druge stopnje uporabilo na podlagi 1. odst. 498. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (Ur.l. RS št. 26/99).