Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL sklep II Cpg 1097/99 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:1999:II.CPG.1097.99 AI generated

Appeal dismissed because objection filed 8 days after receiving enforcement decision was untimely under ZIZ.

Case Number VSL sklep II Cpg 1097/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the appeal against the first-instance judgment, confirming the lower court's rejection of the debtor's objection. The debtor argued that the enforcement obligation was satisfied, but the court found the objection was filed on December 21, 1998, eight days after receiving the enforcement decision on December 3, 1998. Consequently, the court ruled the objection untimely under the Enforcement Act, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 3 paragraph 9 of the Enforcement Act; Article 3 paragraph 58 of the Enforcement Act: An objection filed after the expiration of the eight-day period following receipt of the enforcement decision is inadmissible and must be rejected.

Keywords

AI generated
enforcement objection statutory time limit inadmissible appeal procedural deadline enforcement act

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 3 paragraph 9 of the Enforcement Act
Article 3 paragraph 58 of the Enforcement Act
Article 380 paragraph 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba se zavrne kot neutemeljena in se potrdi izpodbijani sklep sodišča prve stopnje.

[JEDRO]

Ugovor se kot prepozen zavrže, ker je bil vložen po preteku 8 dni.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje je ugovor dolžnika s sklepom zavrglo kot prepozen.

Dolžnik je vložil pritožbo, v kateri navaja, da je pritožba morala prispeti pravočasno. Obveznost do firme so poravnali in zato ni razloga za izterjavo.

Pritožba ni utemeljena.

Iz podatkov spisa izhaja, da je dolžnik sklep o izvršbi prejel dne 3.12.1998, ugovor pa je priporočeno poslal 21.12.1998, to je o preteku 8 dni od prejema sklepa. Sodišče prve stopnje je zato utemeljeno ugovor dolžnika zavrglo na podlagi 3. odst. 9. čl. in 3. odst. 58. čl. ZIZ, saj ga je dolžnik vložil prepozno, ker je 8-dnevni rok potekel dne 14.12.1998. Neutemeljeno pritožbo je bilo potrebno zavrniti in potrditi sklep sodišča prve stopnje po 2. tč. 380. čl. ZPP v zvezi s 15 čl. ZIZ.