Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSK sklep Cpg 348/99 ECLI:SI:VSKP:1999:CPG.348.99 AI generated

Enforcement suspended due to failure to deposit security; appeal dismissed as notice was properly served.

Case Number VSK sklep Cpg 348/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court in Koper dismissed the creditor's appeal, upholding the first-instance court's decision to suspend enforcement. The creditor failed to deposit security for enforcement costs within the eight-day period after receiving a formal notice served on their authorized representative. The court rejected the creditor's claim that they never received the notice, finding the service record valid and the suspension legally justified under the Enforcement Act.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

3. odst. 32. čl. Zakona o izvršilnem postopku (ZIP): If a creditor fails to deposit security for enforcement costs within the prescribed period after being notified, the court must suspend enforcement, and such suspension stands if the notice was properly served.

Keywords

AI generated
enforcement suspension security deposit requirement service of notice enforcement costs creditor appeal ZIP Act provision authorized representative

Cited Legislation

AI generated
3. odst. 32. čl. Zakona o izvršilnem postopku (ZIP)
Z izpodbijanim sklepom je sodišče prve stopnje ustavilo izvršbo v skladu z določilom 3. odst. 32. čl. Zakona o izvršilnem postopku (ZIP), ker upnik v določenem 8-dnevnem roku ni založil predujma.
AI generated
VSL sklep III Cp 655/2000
Appeal dismissed; enforcement suspended due to failure to pay advance execution costs after proper notice.
VSL sklep II Cpg 174/2001
Appeal allowed; court held ZIZ Art. 38(3) applies only to non-payment, not failure to submit proof of payment.
VSL sklep III Cp 1935/2000
Appeal allowed: Court quashes first instance ruling for failing to decide on extension of advance payment deadline.
VSL sklep II Cpg 875/2000
Appeal dismissed because appellant admitted failure to deposit advance execution costs as required by law.
VSL sklep III Cp 234/2000
Enforcement suspended due to creditor's failure to post security for external enforcement agent costs.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba upnika se zavrne kot neutemeljena in p o t r d i izpodbijani sklep sodišča prve stopnje.

[JEDRO]

Če upnik v danem roku na poziv sodišča ni položil predujma za kritje stroškov izvršilnega organa, sodišče izvršbo ustavi.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Z izpodbijanim sklepom je sodišče prve stopnje ustavilo izvršbo v skladu z določilom 3. odst. 32. čl. Zakona o izvršilnem postopku (ZIP), ker upnik v določenem 8-dnevnem roku ni založil predujma.

Zoper ta sklep se pritožuje upnik po svoji pooblaščenki in predlaga njegovo razveljavitev. V pritožbi navaja, da upnik nikoli ni prejel sklepa o naložitvi plačila predujma za izvršilne stroške.

Pritožba upnika ni utemeljena.

Pritožbeno sodišče ugotavlja, da je sodišče prve stopnje izpodbijani sklep izdalo v skladu z določilom tedaj veljavnega 3. odst. 32. čl.

ZIP. Poziv, naj upnik založi predujem, je bil namreč vročen pooblaščenki upnika dne 29.5.1997 (list. št. 9 spisa). Pritožbeno sodišče je zato pritožbo upnika zavrnilo kot neutemeljeno in potrdilo izpodbijani sklep sodišča prve stopnje.