Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL sklep I Kp 1062/99 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:1999:I.KP.1062.99 AI generated

Appeal against correction of judgment number due to clerical error dismissed as justified.

Case Number VSL sklep I Kp 1062/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court dismissed the private prosecutor's appeal against a correction order issued by the first-instance court. The first-instance court corrected the judgment number from 56 to 568 upon the defendant's request, identifying a clear clerical error between the written judgment and the original document. The court ruled the correction justified under the Criminal Procedure Act because the discrepancy was an obvious transcription mistake, leaving the appeal without merit.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

1. odstavek 365. člen Zakona o kazenskem postopku: A correction of a judgment based on a clerical error or discrepancy between the written text and the original document is justified and cannot be overturned by an appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
clerical error correction judgment number amendment transcription mistake Criminal Procedure Act private prosecutor appeal original document verification procedural correction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
1. odstavek 365. člen Zakona o kazenskem postopku
AI generated
VSM sklep I Cp 191/2017
Appeal dismissed; appeal against a correction of a final judgment for clerical errors is inadmissible under ZPP. Appeal dismissed; appeal against a correction of a final judgment for clerical errors is inadmissible under ZPP.
Sklep Cp 24/2009
Appeal against a corrective ruling correcting a clerical error is dismissed as it cannot alter substantive rights.
VSL sklep II Cp 714/97
Court of Appeal allows appeal, quashing first instance correction of defendant's name error caused by plaintiff.
Sklep I Up 1225/2002
Interpretative Constitutional Court ruling cannot serve as basis for request under Art. 46 ZUstS.
VSL sklep I Cp 2765/2010
Appeal dismissed; land registry court order upheld as underlying transfer decree became final and binding.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba pooblaščenca zasebnega tožilca proti popravnemu sklepu se zavrne kot neutemeljena.

[JEDRO]

Pritožba pooblaščenca zasebnega tožilca proti popravnemu sklepu se zavrne kot neutemeljena ker je bil sklep utemeljen.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Z uvodoma navedenim sklepom je prvostopno sodišče na predlog obdolženca popravilo sodbo pod opr.štev. K 115/98 z dne 14.5.1999 in sicer je številko 56 nadomestilo s številko 568. Proti takšnemu popravnemu sklepu se je pravočasno pritožil pooblaščenc zasebnega tožilca iz vseh pritožbenih razlogov in predlagal, da se ta sklep razveljavi, nadalje naj se razveljavi sodba in tudi klavzula pravnomočnosti sodbe ter zadeva vrne v novo sojenje oziroma, da se zasebnemu tožilcu da možnost podati pritožbo zoper sodbo.

Pritožba ni utemeljena.

Pritožbo zoper ta sklep je bilo potrebno zavrniti kot neutemeljeno, ker se je pri pregledu pisno izdelane sodbe z izvirnikom ugotovilo, da je dejansko prišlo do pomote v številkah in da je prvostopno sodišče na predlog obdolženca pravilno presodilo, da obstoja neskladje med pisno izdelano sodbo in izvirnikom in da gre za očitno pomoto pri prepisu. Zato je bila izdaja popravnega sklepa na podlagi določil 1. odstavka 365. člena Zakona o kazenskem postopku utemeljena in ga pritožba ne more omajati. To kar trdi pooblaščenec v zvezi s pritožbo zoper sodbo pa je predmet presoje pritožbe v zvezi z drugim izdanim sklepom sodišča prve stopnje.