Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL sodba I Cpg 1050/98 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:1999:I.CPG.1050.98 AI generated

Unfounded appeal dismissed because it lacked reasoning and was reviewed only within official examination limits.

Case Number VSL sodba I Cpg 1050/98
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court rejected the appeal as unfounded and upheld the first-instance judgment. The appellant filed a timely but unreasoned appeal containing no specific grounds or requests, merely reiterating an objection to the enforcement order. Consequently, the court reviewed the case solely within the limits of official examination under Article 365(2) of the Civil Procedure Act, finding no procedural violations or errors in the application of substantive law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 365(2) of the Civil Procedure Act; Article 368 of the Civil Procedure Act: An appeal lacking reasoning is reviewed only within the limits of official examination, and if no procedural violations are found, the appeal is dismissed and the first-instance judgment is upheld.

Keywords

AI generated
unreasoned appeal official examination Civil Procedure Act procedural review dismissal of appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 365(2) of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 368 of the Civil Procedure Act
AI generated
VSL sodba I Cpg 1281/98
Appeal dismissed; defendant must pay interest if contract deadline missed, even if deadline unclear.
VSL sklep II Cp 1850/98
Appeal allowed; summons by mail to tenant's door without prior refusal invalidates enforcement proceedings.
VSL sodba I Cpg 252/2001
Appeal dismissed because defendant failed to raise evidence requests in first instance, violating procedural rules.
VSL sodba I Cpg 1171/98
Appeal dismissed; incomplete party name and prepayment terms upheld as valid contract elements.
VSL sodba I Cp 1454/99
Appeal dismissed; execution on certified document requires objection, not answer, and medical excuses must be documented.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba se kot neutemeljena zavrne in se potrdi sodba sodišča prve stonje.

[JEDRO]

Ker pritožba ni obrazložena, jo je pritožbeno sodišče preizkusilo le še v mejah uradnega preizkusa iz 2. odst. 365. čl. ZPP. Ker tudi teh kršitev ni bilo je pritožbo kot neutemeljeno zavrnilo in izpodbijano sodbo potrdilo (368. čl. ZPP).

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje je sklep o izvršbi Okrajnega sodiča v Ljubljani, opr.št. VIII Ig 359/96-2 z dne 4.3.1996 vzdržalo v veljavi v 1. in 3. točki in toženi stranki naložilo v plačilon adaljnje pravdne stroške tožeče stranke.

Proti sodbi je tožena stranka vložila pravočasno pritožbo,ki ni obrazložena. Edina navedba pritožbe, ki je identična z navedbo v ugovoru zoper izdan sklep o izvršbi je, da pritožnica v celoti ugovarja proti sodbi. Ne vsebuje niti pritožbenega razloga niti predloga. Zato je pritožbeno sodšče izpodbjiano sodbo preizkusilo le v mejah uradnega priezkusa iz 2. odst. 365. čl. ZPP. Ob tem ni zasledilo nobenih absolutnih bistvenih kršitev določil pravdnega postopka iz 2. odstavka 365. čl. ZPP. Ker je ugotovilo, da je na podlagi ugotovljenega dejanskega stanja prvostopno sodišče pravilno uporabilo materialno pravo, je pritožbo kot neutemeljeno zavrnilo in izodbijano sodbo potrdilo.