Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSC sklep Cp 609/99 ECLI:SI:VSCE:1999:CP.609.99 AI generated

Appeal against a court order to correct a claim is inadmissible as it concerns procedural management.

Case Number VSC sklep Cp 609/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The second-instance court dismissed the appeal against a first-instance judge's order requiring the applicant to complete their denationalization claim. The applicant argued that all required documents were submitted and that the administrative body should have acted under specific statutes, contending the matter was administrative rather than judicial. The court ruled that orders for correcting or supplementing claims issued during pre-trial preparations are procedural management acts against which no appeal is permitted under the relevant procedural law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

109. člen ZPP/77; 2. odstavek 278. člen ZPP/77: An order by a judge to correct or supplement a claim issued during pre-trial preparations is a procedural management act against which no appeal is permitted.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural management correction of claim inadmissible appeal denationalization claim pre-trial preparation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
109. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP/77)
2. odstavek 278. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP/77)
1. točka 380. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP)
člen 56 Zakona o denacionalizaciji (ZDen)
člen 37 Zakona o nepravdnem postopku (ZNP)
AI generated
VSK sklep I Cp 1146/2000
Denationalization claim dismissed by first instance court due to missing documents, but allowed on appeal.
VSC sklep Cp 1095/99
Appeal against a court order to supplement a denationalization application is inadmissible under ZPP. Appeal against a court order to supplement a denationalization application is inadmissible under ZPP.
sodba II U 380/2012
Administrative court dismisses request to restart procedure as filed after one-month statutory deadline expired.
VSL sklep II Cp 2240/2010
Appeal dismissed because lawyer filed motion for trial restoration without attaching required power of attorney.
Sklep II Ips 255/2008
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where incomplete denationalization request was later clarified within the statutory deadline.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba se z a v r ž e .

[JEDRO]

Sklep o ukrepih za popravo oz. dopolnitev vloge je sklep, ki ga izda sodnik med pripravami na glavno obravnavo oz. narok v nepravdnem postopku in se tiče vodstva postopka. Zoper takšen sklep ni pritožbe.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje je predlagateljico s sklepom pozvalo, da v roku 45 dni na določen način dopolni svojo vlogo - predlog za denacionalizacijo.

Predlagateljica se je zoper tak sklep pritožila in navajala, da so vlogi priloženi vsi podatki in vse listine, ki jih določa 62.člen ZDen, sicer bi moral upravni organ Občine Ž. (kamor je svojo vlogo za denacionalizacijo podala najprej) že pred petimi leti ravnati po 68.členu ZUP. Sploh pa gre v tej zadevi za upravno in ne sodno pristojnost.

Pritožba ni dovoljena. Sklep o ukrepih za popravo oz. dopolnitev vloge po določbi 109.člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP/77) je sklep, ki ga izda sodnik med pripravami na glavno obravnavo oz. na narok v nepravdnem postopku in se tiče vodstva postopka. Zoper takšen sklep ni pritožbe po določbi 2.odstavka 278.člena ZPP/77. Zato je sodišče druge stopnje sklenilo, da se pritožba kot nedovoljena zavrže na podlagi 1.točke 380.člena ZPP v zv. s členom 56 Zakona o denacionalizaciji (ZDen) in členom 37 Zakona o nepravdnem postopku (ZNP). Sodišče namreč z nepravilnim pravnim poukom, da je pritožba dovoljena, ne more spremeniti objektivnega prava.