Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSM sklep Cpg 239/95 ECLI:SI:VSMB:1997:CPG.239.95 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; creditor must name bank in execution request for natural person debtor under ZIP s. 98.

Case Number VSM sklep Cpg 239/95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellant's appeal against the rejection of an execution request was dismissed as unfounded. The creditor failed to provide the required bank account details in the request, assuming the court would investigate on its own initiative. The court ruled that for a natural person debtor, the creditor must explicitly name the financial institution under ZIP s. 98, while the court only handles remaining deposit details via inquiries.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

ZIP s. 98; ZIP s. 100: In execution proceedings against a natural person debtor, the creditor must specify the financial institution in the request, and the court supplements this with its own inquiries.

Keywords

AI generated
execution request natural person debtor ZIP s. 98 bank account details court inquiry duty execution appeal ZIP Act

Cited Legislation

AI generated
ZIP s. 98
ZIP s. 100
AI generated
VSC sklep Cpg 390/2002
Appeal allowed: First instance court erred by treating partial tax payment as withdrawal without specific warning.
VSC Sklep II Ip 180/2020
Appeal allowed; electronic signature via e-Enforcement portal validly constitutes a valid signature under enforcement law.
VSM sklep I Ip 982/2009
Appeal allowed; listing debtor's assets is not a last resort if other enforcement methods fail.
VSL sklep II Cpg 688/2000
Appeal allowed; direct service on client with counsel is a procedural violation requiring retrial.
VSM sklep I Ip 1128/2015
Appeal dismissed; creditor's request for asset list and enforcement costs rejected under ZIZ provisions.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba se zavrne kot neutemeljena in se potrdi sklep sodišča prve stopnje.

[JEDRO]

V primeru, ko je dolžnik fizična oseba z imenom in priimkom mora upnik, ki želi izvršbo na denarna sredstva dolžnika, skladno s 98. členom ZIP v izvršilnem predlogu navesti denarni zavod, sodišče pa nato samo s poizvedbami ugotovi ostale podatke o depozitu.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Upnik se je pravočasno pritožil zoper sklep o zavrženju izvršilnega predloga. V pritožbi je navedel, da je sodišču v roku sporočil naj samo po uradni dolžnosti opravi ustrezne poizvedbe.

Pritožba ni utemeljena.

Pritožnik je spregledal, da je sodišče primarno zahtevalo pravilno označbo dolžnika. Iz navedbe v izvršilnem predlogu verjetno izhaja, da ne gre za gospodarsko družbo - torej je lahko dolžnik le fizična oseba z imenom in priimkom. V takem primeru mora upnik, ki želi izvršbo na denarna sredstva dolžnika, skladno s 98. členom ZIP v izvršilnem predlogu navesti denarni zavod - sodišče pa nato samo s poizvedbami ugotovi ostale podatke o depozitu. Ker upnik na zahtevo sodišča ni sporočil nobenega od zahtevanih podatkov, je njegova pritožba neutemeljena.

Izrek o pritožbenih stroških je odpadel, ker niso bili priglašeni.