Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSM sklep Cpg 258/95 ECLI:SI:VSMB:1997:CPG.258.95 AI generated

Appeal allowed; execution request valid without enforceability certificate when filed at same court.

Case Number VSM sklep Cpg 258/95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court allowed the appeal and revoked the first-instance court's rejection of the execution request, ordering the case returned for further proceedings. The uplink filed an execution request at the same court that issued the enforceable title, arguing no certificate of enforceability was needed under the ZIP Act. The court held that the statutory exemption applies regardless of subsequent changes in court organization, as the benefit is tied to the filing date.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

I. odstavek 36. člen ZIP; When an execution request is filed at the same court that issued the enforceable title, no certificate of enforceability is required, and this procedural benefit remains valid despite subsequent changes in court organization.

Keywords

AI generated
execution request filing certificate of enforceability ZIP Act provision court organization change procedural benefit retention same court requirement enforceable title issuance

Cited Legislation

AI generated
I. odstavek 36. člen ZIP
AI generated
VSRS Sklep I Up 10/2021
Appeal dismissed because plaintiff failed to pay court fee within statutory deadline after fee waiver request was rejected.
VSC Sklep I Ip 243/2017
Appeal allowed; first instance court dismissed appeal due to lack of reasoning on irreparable harm facts.
VSK Sklep CDn 153/2023
Appeal dismissed; electronic land registry requires specific attachment of evidence documents for valid entry. Electronic land registry requires specific attachment of evidence documents for valid entry.
VSL sklep II Cpg 1079/99
Appeal granted for procedural error; debt objection dismissed as unreasoned and irrelevant to enforcement.
Sklep I Up 9/2013
Appeal dismissed; appeal must be filed by a lawyer holding a state bar exam, not by a layperson. Ignorance of law does not excuse non-compliance.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožbi se ugodi in se sklep sodišča prve stopnje opr. št. IV Ig 1127/94-5 z dne 13.4.1995 razveljavi ter zadeva vrne sodišču prve stopnje v nadaljno odločanje.

Pritožbeni stroški so nadaljni izvršilni stroški.

[JEDRO]

Po določilu I. odstavka 36. člena ZIP upniku ni potrebno priložiti k izvršilnemu predlogu potrdilo o izvršljivosti, kadar je izvršilni predlog vložen pri istem sodišču, ki je o terjatvi odločilo. Okoliščina, da je dne 1.1.1995 pričela veljati nova organiziranost rednih sodišč, ne more upniku odvzeti opisane procesne ugodnosti, ki je po citiranem določilu vezana na dan vložitve izvršilnega predloga.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Upnik se je pravočasno pritožil zoper sklep sodišča prve stopnje, ki je izvršilni predlog zavrglo, ker upnik na poziv sodišča ni predložil potrdila o pravnomočnosti.

Pritožba je utemeljena.

Po določilu I. odstavka 36. člena ZIP upniku ni potrebno priložiti k izvršilnemu predlogu potrdilo o izvršljivosti, kadar je izvršilni predlog vložen pri istem sodišču, ki je o terjatvi odločilo. Upnik je dne 15.12.1994 vložil pri temeljnem sodišču izvršilni predlog, isto sodišče pa je izdalo izvršilni naslov - sklep opr. štev. II Pg 452/93 z dne 8.11.1994. Okoliščina, da je dne 1.1.1995 pričela veljati nova organiziranost rednih sodišč, ne more upniku odvzeti opisane procesne ugodnosti, ki je po citiranem določilu vezana na dan vložitve izvršilnega predloga.

V novem postopku bo prvostopno sodišče odločilo tudi o nadaljnih izvršilnih stroških.