Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSM sklep Cpg 303/96 ECLI:SI:VSMB:1996:CPG.303.96 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; creditor's separate payment right in bankruptcy expires with statutory filing deadline regardless of error correction.

Case Number VSM sklep Cpg 303/96
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appeal was dismissed as unfounded, upholding the first-instance court's rejection of the creditor's claim for a separate payment right. The creditor filed a debt and separate payment claim within the statutory two-month period but later attempted to correct a reduction in the debt amount. The court ruled that the right to demand priority payment terminates upon the expiration of the filing deadline, regardless of subsequent error corrections or the commencement of bankruptcy proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

10. člen ZPPSL; 1. in 6. odst. 137. člen ZPPSL: The right to claim separate payment in bankruptcy proceedings expires upon the expiration of the statutory filing deadline, and the commencement of bankruptcy proceedings does not extend this right even if errors in the debt declaration are subsequently corrected.

Keywords

AI generated
bankruptcy proceedings separate payment right statutory filing deadline creditor's claim priority payment error correction preclusion of right

Cited Legislation

AI generated
10. člen ZPPSL
1. in 6. odst. 137. člen ZPPSL
AI generated
VSM sklep Cpg 6/97
Appeal allowed; court voided first instance ruling for re-examining a debt already adjudicated in bankruptcy proceedings.
VSL sklep Cst 76/2011
Appeal dismissed; lawyer must file claims electronically under transitional rules effective Jan 1, 2011.
VSL sklep I Cpg 42/2011
Appeal allowed; claim for annulment of corporate resolutions is not a bankruptcy claim requiring declaration. Court found first instance misapplied bankruptcy law regarding claim declaration. Claimant must now prove standing under company law despite bankruptcy. Appeal allowed; claim for annulment of corporate resolutions is not a bankruptcy claim requiring declaration. Court found first instance misapplied bankruptcy law regarding claim declaration. Claimant must now prove standing under company law despite bankruptcy.
VSL Sklep Cst 521/2017
Appeal allowed; sale order in personal bankruptcy must be served to debtor, not just published. Court ruled service required for appeal rights. Appeal allowed; sale order in personal bankruptcy must be served to debtor, not just published. Court ruled service required for appeal rights.
VSL sklep III Cpg 12/2001
Appeal dismissed; Article 3(2) of Insolvency Act applies to ex officio insolvency proceedings initiated due to failed compulsory settlement.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba se zavrne kot neutemeljena in se potrdi sklep sodišča prve stopnje.

[JEDRO]

Ena izmed razlik med jamčevanjem za napake in garancijo je prav v tem, da lahko stranka zahteva odpravo napak ves čas garancijskega roka in notifikacija ni vezana na določen čas (6 mesecev) po odkritju napak - 502. člen ZOR.

Po sodni praksi začne teči enoletni rok za vložitev tožbe tudi od zadnjega dne sanacijskih del, ki so opravljena na zahtevo stranke, saj bi jo sicer izvajalec lahko izigral z navidezno pripravljenostjo odpraviti napake.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Stečajni upnik se je pravočasno pritožil zoper sklep prvostopnega sodišča, ki je njegovo prijavo ločitvene pravice zavrglo. V pritožbi je navedel, da po določilu 10. člena ZPPSL začetek stečaja nima vpliva na ločitveno pravico.

Pritožba ni utemeljena.

Prvostopno sodišče je objavilo oklic o začetku stečajnega postopka v Uradnem listu RS dne 17.11.1995. Dvomesečni rok za priglasitev upniške terjatve, vključno s pravico do ločenega poplačila iz 1. in 6. odst. 137. člena Zakona o prisilni poravnavi, stečaju in likvidaciji (Ur.l.RS št.67/93 - v nadaljevanju ZPPSL), je potekel v sredo 17.1.1996. Upnik je dne 13.12.1995 prijavil terjatev v znesku 25,357.394,67 sit - torej v roku. Dne 10.6.1996 pa je poleg delnega zmanjšanja svoje terjatve (sedaj zahteva 22,300.407,67 sit) prijavil tudi ločitveno pravico za polačilo navedene terjatve. Ker je navedeni zakonski rok, ki velja za prijavo terjatve in ločitvene pravice, prekluziven, pravica zahtevati prednostno poplačilo v stečajnem postopku preneha z potekom roka. Pritožnik je v zmoti, ko se sklicuje na določila 10. člena ZPPSL - začetek stečaja res nima posledic na pravico do polačila iz določenih dolžnikovih stvari - vendar ob pogoju, da upnik to pravico uveljavi s pravočasno prijavo.