Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSM sklep Cpg 132/94 ECLI:SI:VSMB:1996:CPG.132.94 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; first instance court correctly applied execution law prohibiting revision in security proceedings.

Case Number VSM sklep Cpg 132/94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellant challenged the first-instance court's rejection of a request for revision in a security proceeding. The court correctly determined that revision is not permitted under the relevant execution law. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as unfounded, and the first-instance decision was upheld.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

9. člen Zakona o izvršilnem postopku; Revision is not permitted in security proceedings under the execution law, and appeals against such procedural rulings are inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
security proceedings execution law revision prohibition appeal dismissal procedural bar

Cited Legislation

AI generated
9. člen Zakona o izvršilnem postopku
AI generated
Sklep X Ips 241/2009
Supreme Court dismisses appeal for lack of specific legal issue and severe consequences proof under ZUS-1.
VSL sklep II Cp 1479/99
Appeal granted for retrial request; appeal against dismissal of appeal rejected as untimely.
VSL Sklep II Cp 339/2023
Appeal granted; suspension of proceedings based on Article 206(4) ZPP dismissed due to insufficient weight given to the plaintiff's right to a timely trial.
Sklep X Ips 271/2012
Supreme Court dismisses appeal for failure to define material legal issue regarding return of property.
Sklep X Ips 530/2008
Appeal dismissed because customs procedure renewal dispute lacks monetary value and fails review conditions.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba se zavrne kot neutemeljena in se potrdi sklep sodišča prve stopnje.

[JEDRO]

Prvostopno sodišče se je pravilno sklicevalo na določilo 9. člena zakona o izvršilnem postopku, da v postopku zavarovanja ni dovoljena revizija.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Tožeča stranka je v pravdi predlagala izdajo začasne odredbe. Ta predlog je sodišče pravnomočno zavrnilo. Tožeča stranka se je nato pritožila zoper sklep s katerim je prvostopno sodišče zavrglo predlog za revizijo.

Pritožba ni utemeljena.

Prvostopno sodišče se je pravilno sklicevalo na določilo 9. člena zakona o izvršilnem postopku, da v postopku zavarovanja ni dovoljena revizija.

Izrek o pritožbenih stroškoih je odpadel, ker niso bili priglašeni.