Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSM sklep Cpg 452/95 ECLI:SI:VSMB:1995:CPG.452.95 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; majority vote valid per Company Law; shareholder agreement clause upheld.

Case Number VSM sklep Cpg 452/95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appeal against the court's registration of a change in a company's representative was rejected as unfounded. The appellant, a former director, argued the resolution lacked a valid majority, but the court found the 66% vote by PR and MD sufficient under the Law on Economic Companies. The court upheld the company agreement's voting clause as consistent with statutory requirements for limited liability companies.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

ZGD 1993; ZGD 1993: A resolution by a company's general meeting to change its representative is valid if adopted by the majority of voting rights, and provisions in the company agreement regarding voting rights are consistent with the Law on Economic Companies if they do not contradict mandatory statutory rules.

Keywords

AI generated
Company Law General Meeting Voting Rights Limited Liability Company Shareholder Agreement Corporate Governance Statutory Majority

Cited Legislation

AI generated
ZGD 1993
AI generated
Sklep III DoR 101/2011 in III DoR 109/2011
Supreme Court dismisses appeal for nullity of court register entry due to lack of legal interest.
VSL Sklep IV Cpg 276/2023
Inheritance of business shares transfers title at death, allowing heirs to exercise corporate rights before registration.
VSL sklep IV Cpg 19/98
Supreme Court holds ZGD Art. 449 mandatory only if LLC's articles of association do not regulate management appointment/removal.
VSL sklep IV Cpg 156/2015
Court allows registration change for director appointment where minister's opinion was obtained, regardless of its content.
VSM sklep Cpg 279/95
Appeal against company register entry dismissed; only annulment action under Art. 41 of Register Law available for invalid documents.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba se zavrne kot neutemeljena in se potrdi sklep sodišča prve stopnje.

[JEDRO]

Določilo družbene pogodbe je skladno z ZGD v obsegu, ki se nanaša na zastopnike družb in posebna določila o družbi z omejeno odgovornostjo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Bivši direktor in pooblaščenec ustanovitelja - torej oseba z izkazanim pravnim interesom, se je pravočasno pritožil zoper sklep o vpisu spremembe zastopnika gospodarske družbe v sodni register. V pritožbi je navedel, da sklep o spremembi zastopnika ni bil sprejet z veljavno večino glasov.

Pritožba ni utemeljena.

Najprej je potrebno ugotoviti, da je dne 30.7.1993 pričel veljati zakon o gospodarskih družbah (ZGD), v skladu s katerim je potrebno presojati tudi dne 27.10.1993 vloženi predlog za spremembo zastopnika družbe z omejeno odgovornostjo.

Pritožnik se zmotno sklicuje na družbeno pogodbo, saj je v 12. členu le-te določeno, da ima vsak vlagatelj pravico do enega glasa za vsakih vloženih 20 DEM. Iz zapisnika seje skupščine z dne 20.9.1993 je razvidno, da sta za postavitev novega direktorja oziroma zastopnika glasovala PR in MD, ki imata skupaj 66%-ov glasov.

Navedeno določilo družbene pogodbe je skladno z ZGD v obsegu, ki se nanaša na zastopnike družb in posebna določila o družbi z omejeno odgovornostjo.

Sodišče prve stopnje je torej utemeljeno izvršilo vpis v sodni register.