Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSK sklep Kp 284/95 ECLI:SI:VSKP:1995:KP.284.95 AI generated

Defense appeal withdrawn before ruling; transfer decision remains with Ministry of Justice per ZKP.

Case Number VSK sklep Kp 284/95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The defense lawyer withdrew their appeal before the higher court could rule, resulting in the appeal being declared inadmissible under Article 402, paragraph 3 of the Criminal Procedure Act. Although the defense argued for immediate extradition to Italy, the court clarified that the decision to extradite lies with the Minister of Justice, not the court, which only verifies if conditions are met. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal as procedurally invalid and confirmed the original transfer order.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 402, paragraph 3 of the Criminal Procedure Act; Article 530, paragraph 1 of the Criminal Procedure Act: An appeal withdrawn before the court's decision is inadmissible, and the authority to decide on extradition remains with the Minister of Justice, not the court.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawn appeal inadmissible appeal extradition decision Minister of Justice Criminal Procedure Act

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 402, paragraph 3 of the Criminal Procedure Act
Article 530, paragraph 1 of the Criminal Procedure Act
Article 25, paragraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act
Article 201, paragraph 1, point 2 of the Criminal Procedure Act
AI generated
VSL Sklep I Kp 73952/2022
Appeal allowed; Italy's prosecutor's vague promise of retrial failed to meet double jeopardy safeguards under ZSKZDČEU-1.
VSK sklep Cpg 159/93
Court dismisses appeal allowing return of case; parking fee is damages, not transport costs.
Sodba U 233/2004
Administrative court dismisses appeal against extradition decision where surrender conditions were confirmed by final court ruling.
VSK sklep II Cpg 120/2005
Appeal dismissed; foreign judgment recognized despite procedural irregularities absent total denial of participation.
Sklep Cpg 1/2007
Appeal dismissed; foreign judgment enforceability review limited to formal requirements under Brussels Convention.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba zagovornika obsojenega L.C. se kot nedovoljena z a v r ž e.

[JEDRO]

Minister za pravosodje odloča o izročitvi obsojenca skladno s 1. odst. 530. čl. ZKP. Sodišče namreč preizkusi, ali so podani vsi pogoji za izročitev, dovoli pa jo minister za pravosodje.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Senat sodišča prve stopnje (6. odstavek 25. člena ZKP) je ugotovil, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za izročitev Republiki Italiji L.C., obsojenega zaradi kaznivega dejanja goljufivega denarnega bankrota po 216. in 648. členu Kazenskega zakonika Republike Italije s pravnomočno sodbo sodišča v Pisi z dne 22.1.1991 opr. št. ...

Obsojencu je iz pripornega razloga po 1. točki 2. odstavka 201. člena ZKP podaljšalo pripor.

Zoper sklep se je za odvetniško pisarno, ki zagovarja obsojenca, zaradi bistvene kršitve določb kazenskega postopka, pritožil odvetniški kandidat M.Z. Predlagal je, da višje sodišče pritožbi ugodi in izpodbijani sklep razveljavi ter zadevo vrne sodišču prve stopnje v novo odločanje, pripor zoper obsojenca pa odpravi.

Glede na to, da je obsojenčev zagovornik vloženo pritožbo dne 9.11.1995, še preden je o njej odločalo sodišče druge stopnje, umaknil, jo je bilo v skladu s 3. odstavkom 402. člena ZKP potrebno kot nedovoljeno zavreči.

Kolikor pa se obsojenčev zagovornik v svoji vlogi, s katero je umaknil pritožbo zavzema za takojšnjo izročitev obsojenega Republiki Italiji, pa mu je potrebno pojasniti, da odločanje o tem ni v pristojnosti sodišča, pač pa ministra za pravosodje, kot to določa 1. odstavek 530. člena ZKP. Sodišče namreč preizkusi, ali so podani vsi pogoji za izročitev, dovoli pa jo minister za pravosodje.

Spričo povedanega je bilo potrebno odločiti kot v izreku.