Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL sklep III Cp 725/94 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:1994:III.CP.725.94 AI generated

Creditor's objection and stay of execution appeal by debtor dismissed as they lack standing.

Case Number VSL sklep III Cp 725/94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The first-instance court rejected the debtor's objection and request for a stay of execution against the creditor's property. The debtor appealed, claiming ownership of the premises based on self-construction from horse stables under the Residential Act. The appellate court dismissed the appeal because only a third party with a right preventing execution can file such objections or requests, which the debtor did not possess. Consequently, the court ruled the debtor lacked standing to appeal the rejection of the creditor's procedural requests.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

5. poglavje Zakona o izvršbi in zavarovanju; 65. člen Zakona o izvršbi in zavarovanju: Only a third party asserting a right preventing execution may file objections or requests for a stay of execution; a debtor lacks standing to appeal the rejection of such creditor-initiated procedural requests.

Keywords

AI generated
standing to appeal third party objection stay of execution Zakon o izvršbi procedural standing execution proceedings property ownership

Cited Legislation

AI generated
5. poglavje Zakona o izvršbi in zavarovanju
65. člen Zakona o izvršbi in zavarovanju
3. odstavek 358. člen ZPP
167. člen ZPP
člena ZPP), jo je pritožbeno sodišče zavrglo (167. člen ZPP).
AI generated
VSK sklep Cp 317/93
Court dismisses appeal when creditor fails to provide service address after judicial inquiry under ZPP Art. 148.
VSL sklep III Cp 968/98
Court rejects appeal; mutual obligation under ZIP prevents both parties from filing enforcement requests.
VSL sklep III Cp 2143/99
Appeal dismissed; execution suspended after two failed auctions under Article 95 of the Enforcement Act.
VSL Sklep III Ip 2496/2018
Appeal partially allowed; lower court must review all grounds for execution delay under ZIZ Art. 71.
VSK sklep II Ip 763/2008
Appeal dismissed; service of decision to client instead of counsel does not invalidate appeal if client used counsel.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Dolžnikova pritožba se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

Dolžnik nima pravice do pritožbe zoper sklep, s katerim je zavrnjen ugovor tretjega zoper sklep o izvršbi.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Z izpodbijanim sklepom je sodišče prve stopnje zavrglo ugovor B.

A. zoper izvršbo, prav tako pa tudi njegov predlog za odlog izvršbe.

Zoper ta sklep se pritožuje dolžnik in zatrjuje, da je vložil tožbo za ugotovitev, da je lastnik prostorov, ki sta predmet izvršbe.

Lastnik je postal na podlagi določb 116. člena Stanovanjskega zakona.

Z lastnimi sredstvi je namreč iz konjskih hlevov uredil sporna prostora in tako pridobil lastninsko pravico.

Pritožba ni dovoljena.

Pravico do ugovora iz 5. poglavja ZIP ima le tretji, to je tisti, ki trdi, da ima glede predmeta izvršbe tako pravico, ki preprečuje izvršbo. Dolžnik pravice do tega ugovora nima, kot tudi ne pravice predlagati odlog izvršbe po 65. členu ZIP. Tudi ta pripada le tretjemu, torej tistemu, ki je zahteval, naj se izvršba na določen predmet izreče za nedopustno. Čim je tako, dolžnik tudi ni upravičen do pritožbe zoper sklep, s katerim sta zavrnjena ugovor tretjega in njegov predlog za odlog izvršbe. Ker je torej dolžnikova pritožba nedovoljena (3. odstavek 358. člena ZPP), jo je pritožbeno sodišče zavrglo (167. člen ZPP).