Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSM sklep Cpg 281/93 ECLI:SI:VSMB:1994:CPG.281.93 AI generated

Appeal dismissed as economic dispute is small value, barring appeal on erroneous fact-finding.

Case Number VSM sklep Cpg 281/93
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court dismissed the appeal because the underlying economic dispute was classified as a small-value case under the Civil Procedure Act. The appellant argued that the first-instance court erred in fact-finding regarding the debtor's delayed payment, but this ground is inadmissible for small-value disputes. Consequently, the court ruled that no appeal on erroneous fact-finding is permitted for such cases, leading to the rejection of the appeal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

člen 502 ZPP; člen 467/I ZPP: In small-value economic disputes, appeals based solely on erroneous or incomplete fact-finding are inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
small-value dispute erroneous fact-finding Civil Procedure Act appeal inadmissibility economic dispute

Cited Legislation

AI generated
člen 502 ZPP
člen 467/I ZPP
člen 367 ZPP
AI generated
VSL sklep III Cp 575/2000
Appeal dismissed; enforcement court must partially revoke enforcement order when debtor raises valid objections.
VSL sklep III Cp 6354/2005
Appeal dismissed: objection to enforcement based on notarial deed does not trigger Article 451 of Civil Procedure Act.
VSL sklep II Cpg 1070/99
Appeal dismissed; objection to enforcement based on invoice irregularities requires partial revocation and transfer to court.
VSL sklep II Cpg 1335/99
Court dismisses appeal against enforcement objection based on verified document where debtor provided business records.
VSL sklep II Cpg 1143/99
Appeal dismissed; partial revocation of enforcement order allowed; debt dispute continues in ordinary proceedings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožba se kot nedovoljena zavrže.

[JEDRO]

Po členu 502 ZPP je šteti predmetni gospodarski spor kot spor majhne vrednosti, zato po določilu člena 467/I ZPP ni dovoljena pritožba, ki uveljavlja pritožbeni razlog zmotne oziroma nepopolne ugotovitve dejanskega stanja.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Prvostopno sodišče dne 23.9.1991 izdalo sklep o dovolitvi izvršbe na podlagi verodostojne listine. Po ugovoru in izvedenem pravdnem postopku je sodišče razsodilo, da se tožbeni zahtevek v celoti zavrne.

Proti prvostopni sodbi je tožeča stranka vložila pravočasno pritožbo, v kateri uveljavlja pritožbeni razlog zmotne in nepopolne ugotovitve dejanskega stanja, ker je dolžnik plačal dolg z zamudo.

Po členu 502 ZPP (glej novelo ZPP v Ur.l.RS št. 55/92, ki je stopila v veljavo dne 5.12.1992) je šteti predmetni gospodarski spor kot spor majhne vrednosti. Zato po določilu člena 467/I ZPP ni dovoljena pritožba, ki uveljavlja pritožbeni razlog zmotne oziroma nepopolne ugotovitve dejanskega stanja - pravilni pravni pouk je zapisan tudi v prvostopni sodbi. Pritožba, ki kot edini pritožbeni razlog navaja napačno ugotovljeno dejansko stanje, ni dovoljena in jo je pritožbeno sodišče po členu 367 ZPP zavrglo.