Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSM sklep Cpg 254/94 ECLI:SI:VSMB:1994:CPG.254.94 AI generated

Partial revocation of enforcement order upheld; court allows enforcement in unchallenged amount.

Case Number VSM sklep Cpg 254/94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court revoked the first-instance enforcement order only to the extent the debtor objected, leaving the remainder legally binding. The debtor challenged the enforcement of a specific sum while the creditor successfully argued for the full amount. Consequently, the court ordered the first instance to reissue the order, enforcing the disputed portion while confirming the validity of the uncontested balance.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

2. odst. 55.a člena ZIP; When an enforcement order is partially revoked due to a debtor's objection, the court must reissue the order in the challenged scope while confirming the enforceability of the unchallenged portion.

Keywords

AI generated
enforcement order partial revocation debtor objection ZIP Act reissue order

Cited Legislation

AI generated
2. odst. 55.a člena ZIP
AI generated
VSL Sklep II Ip 1415/2017
Higher court partially allows appeal, ruling first instance failed to verify debt calculation against notarial title.
VSM sklep Cpg 40/94
Appeal allowed; court ruled debt reduction must be considered before enforcement order becomes final.
VSL sklep III Ip 3492/2016
Appeal allowed; execution court erred on lis pendens due to different enforcement titles and claims.
VSL sklep III Cp 1357/2000
Appeal allowed: First instance court must send unreasoned objection to higher court as appeal.
VSL sklep II Cpg 872/99
Appeal allowed against enforcement objection; debtors' vague claims and lack of evidence rendered objection inadmissible under ZIZ.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pritožbi se ugodi in se sklep sodišča prve stopnje razveljavi in zadeva vrne sodišču I. stopnje v ponovno odločanje.0

[JEDRO]

Sodišče na delni ugovor dolžnika sklepa o izvršbi ne razveljavi v celoti, temveč le v delu, ki mu je dolžnik ugovarjal, v ostalem postane sklep o izvršbi pravnomočen.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

V izvršbi po verodostojni listini je dolžnik v delno ugovarjal zoper izvršilni sklep, prvostopno sodišče pa je izdalo sklep po 2. odst.

55a. člena ZIP in v celoti razveljavilo izvršilni sklep. Zoper sklep se je upnik pravočasno pritožil.

Pritožba je utemeljena.

Prvostopno sodišče je s sklepom naložilo dolžniku plačilo gl.

72.801,60 sit spp in v tem obsegu dovolilo izvršbo. Dolžnik je ugovarjal le delni znesek 42.581,80 sit spp. Zato je upnikova pritožba v obsegu, ki graja celotno razveljavitev izvršilnega sklepa - utemeljena. Pritožnikove nadaljne navedbe glede neutemeljenosti dolžnikovega ugovora bo obravnavalo pravdno sodišče.

Prvostopno sodišče bo v ponovnem postopku izdalo sklep iz 55.a člena ZIP v obsegu ugovora, v presežnem delu pa ugotovilo pravnomočnost in nadaljevalo izvršbo.

Izrek o pritožbenih stroških je odpadel, ker jih pritožnik ni priglasil.